*20

  • Dubious_Fart
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I view forums as the middle era of the internet.

    Th early era was chatrooms, the middle era was forums, and the late era, which we are in now, is all social media.

    I miss the middle era of the internet. Forums were a blast. You could really build a community with those things.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends on definitions.

          1978 for BBS vs either 1974 for the publication of TCP itself, or 1982/1983 for deployment of the same TCP/IP we use today, or 1976 for X.25, or 1977 for the first actual live interconnection of multiple packet switched networks.

          • Troy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Perhaps better phrased: BBS predate the web (http+html) and the modern internet. Gopher doesn’t count ;)

    • mycelia
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agree to all. How would you define the format of what you’re reading right now, some derivitive of a forum?

        • arglebargle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I gotta say no. This is more like a collection of forums. There really is no following, no social aspect other than discussing the topic at hand. I am not promoting myself, I prefer annonymity over identifying myself. I do not think this counts as social media at all.

          • Dubious_Fart
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Disagree, politely… Not in the “OMG INTERNET DISAGREEMENT I HOPE YOUR MOTHER GETS FUCKED BY A HORSE!” way.

            Reddit/Lemmy/Etc are nothing more than slightly more elaborate twitter with better filtering/catagorization. Social media all the way down.

            But its its not a major issue, so its not like we need to invest time in a slapfight over whose wrong and whose right.

            • arglebargle@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nice to know it is a pleasant disagreement. But seriously, this is not social media.

              • Posting other peoples content instead of their own

              • Anonymity over identifiable.

              • Its not better filtering, it is distinct categories and communities, just like forums.

              • Persistent over breaking news.

              • There are no (or few) personal updates or status reports.

              • There is little to no social networking which is the hallmark of social media, like twitter, Linked In, Facebook, etc.

              • Dubious_Fart
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago
                1. Yes, like people often do on social media.
                2. You didnt have to use your real name on social media until relatively recently, and depending on platform.
                3. Yes, Like I said, filters.
                4. Both are persistent, and both have breaking news
                5. People who want everyone to know their personal updates, post them everywhere.
                6. There is tons of social networking on sites like reddit, Lemmy probably less so. but only because its relatively recent in the zeitgeist.