• tracyspcyOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t you take the song too serious? Why average guy song should contain real reasons of happening? It is just song of random guy who feel some struggles in society and sharing it with others in a way he understands it, no?

    You can explain why it is have to be reactionary thing that promotes some dark age ideas.

    Ps wekfare obesity stuff not 100% clear to me, maybe too usa specific.

    • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      how seriously I approach ‘art’ is my prerogative. If one is not comfortable with criticism, they should keep their thoughts to themselves.

      how do you reconcile a position which claims to care about folks without enough to eat, with the line complaining about welfare (food assistance)?

      It isn’t even critical of the capital-owning class or the oppressive heirarchy which protects the institution of private capital, just an ephemeral ‘rich man up north’ (this is a reactionary dogwhistle, if you’re not familiar with the US)

      I think you’re not taking art (and I use this term loosely here) seriously enough.

      everything is political, especially to those not in the priveledged position to pretend aloof detachment holds any value whatsoever.

      the song is trash, at every level.

      • tracyspcyOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        how seriously I take a work of art is my prerogative. If one is not comfortable with criticism, they should keep their thoughts to themsef.

        Totally not, you are broking logic here. If you cannot control your hysteria, it strange that you expect others to not answer you.

        how do you reconcile a position which claims to care about folks without enough to eat, with the line complaining about welfare (food assistance)?

        wrong position, but remains popular narrative among working people. If people already struggle with poverty, it is good start to explain reasons of it.

        furthermore, it isn’t even critical of the capital-owning class or the system which protects the institution of private capital, just an ephemeral ‘rich man up north’ (this is a reactionary dogwhistle, if you’re not familiar with the US)

        not familiar with this “rich man up north” thing, to me it sounds like “rich” in general. Is this real marker of far right anarcho capitalism adepts in usa?

        If there is real use of some words or hidden signs of far right usa slang, just share it here and educate others politely, I’m sure people here including me would like to be aware of such things. Any opportunity should be used to educate people.

          • tracyspcyOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You had a chance to describe all things wrong about this song to every one. Instead, you were acting as an angry Chihuahua, using big words doubly understanding the meaning of it. You lost my attention here.

            • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You had a chance to describe all things wrong about this song to every one.

              I have, with very specific language. you’ve simultaneously accused me of not explaining myself, and of using ‘big words,’ which by your own admission you do not understand. maybe you should focus on understanding my argument before trying to refute my position. attacking me personally, accusing me of anger/ irrationality, is not an effective argument.