A lot of people are trying to get some kind of fame online. It could be people trying to imitate their favorite Instagram celebrity. Obviously people would like to be in a similar position as that celebrity. But some people spend a lot of hours per day trying to take really good selfies and probably won’t ever get fame or fortune.

It does strike me as kind of a libertarian kind of thing.

  • @meloo@lemmy.perthchat.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    becoming a social media celeb is (like the lottery)

    probably the best description ive ever heard of social media celebs. 1 caveat is that there are multiple lotteries -

    • the first is having rich enough parents that if the venture celebritism fails (which is most likely) you’re not at homeless risk

    • being good looking enough + not being toooo disabled in a way that impacts venture internet celebritism

    • a few others im not thinking of atm

    then finally someone can enter the twitch/tiktok/etc streamer lottery

    whereas for reg lottery, you cant boost your odds, aside from buying more tickets

    The act of wanting to comodify yourself isn’t capitalist in a literal sense to me (I could be wrong though) as you aren’t literally exploiting other people’s Labour for profit but the conditions and markets etc (such as people selling themselves to sponsors and advertisement companies) is very capitalist and it makes me sad to see people essentially sell their bodies to companies for a chance of escaping economic instability. I find that so sad but so typical of capitalism so I do see your main point OP, self branding while in itself not inherently capitalist is one facet of a cruel and manipulative capitalist

    You worded it much better than me

    • Ratette (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Yeah full agree regarding the multiple lotteries you’ve mentioned. I’m trying to think of others but I’m drawing a blank 😭