• HughJanus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s the beauty of electric vehicles; you can have both.

      • HughJanus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s not really a significant difference unless you’re talking about aero and wheels/tires, and most sports cars are also fairly aerodynamic.

        Look at the difference in efficiency between Model 3 Performance and a Chevy Bolt.

        Tires can be swapped as needed. As can spoilers and other aero equipment to add down force at the track.

        • Galluf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not a great comparison since I’d categorize the Bolt as being fairly inefficient. It has poor aerodynamics (wrong shape and no flsf bottom) which results in a larger range loss when range matters most at interstate speeds.

          The Bolt is efficient in city driving, but not otherwise. I’d say a better comparison would be between the Mach e and model Y where you do see a meaningful difference in efficiency.

          • HughJanus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not a great comparison since I’d categorize the Bolt as being fairly inefficient.

            Well there aren’t a great deal of slow EVs. Much less sedans at all.

            It’s still similar in efficiency to a Model Y Performance.

            has poor aerodynamics (wrong shape and no flsf bottom) which results in a larger range loss when range matters most at interstate speeds.

            It’s also incredibly slow by comparison. The point is that it’s a massive difference in performance and a comparably miniscule difference in efficiency.