• HughJanus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s not really a significant difference unless you’re talking about aero and wheels/tires, and most sports cars are also fairly aerodynamic.

      Look at the difference in efficiency between Model 3 Performance and a Chevy Bolt.

      Tires can be swapped as needed. As can spoilers and other aero equipment to add down force at the track.

      • Galluf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not a great comparison since I’d categorize the Bolt as being fairly inefficient. It has poor aerodynamics (wrong shape and no flsf bottom) which results in a larger range loss when range matters most at interstate speeds.

        The Bolt is efficient in city driving, but not otherwise. I’d say a better comparison would be between the Mach e and model Y where you do see a meaningful difference in efficiency.

        • HughJanus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not a great comparison since I’d categorize the Bolt as being fairly inefficient.

          Well there aren’t a great deal of slow EVs. Much less sedans at all.

          It’s still similar in efficiency to a Model Y Performance.

          has poor aerodynamics (wrong shape and no flsf bottom) which results in a larger range loss when range matters most at interstate speeds.

          It’s also incredibly slow by comparison. The point is that it’s a massive difference in performance and a comparably miniscule difference in efficiency.