• HughJanus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s not really a significant difference unless you’re talking about aero and wheels/tires, and most sports cars are also fairly aerodynamic.

    Look at the difference in efficiency between Model 3 Performance and a Chevy Bolt.

    Tires can be swapped as needed. As can spoilers and other aero equipment to add down force at the track.

    • Galluf@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not a great comparison since I’d categorize the Bolt as being fairly inefficient. It has poor aerodynamics (wrong shape and no flsf bottom) which results in a larger range loss when range matters most at interstate speeds.

      The Bolt is efficient in city driving, but not otherwise. I’d say a better comparison would be between the Mach e and model Y where you do see a meaningful difference in efficiency.

      • HughJanus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not a great comparison since I’d categorize the Bolt as being fairly inefficient.

        Well there aren’t a great deal of slow EVs. Much less sedans at all.

        It’s still similar in efficiency to a Model Y Performance.

        has poor aerodynamics (wrong shape and no flsf bottom) which results in a larger range loss when range matters most at interstate speeds.

        It’s also incredibly slow by comparison. The point is that it’s a massive difference in performance and a comparably miniscule difference in efficiency.