• AgreeableLandscapeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    One word: Pocahontas. Or rather: Their “adaptation” (in the loosest possible terms) the story of the real indigenous child (yes child) that was forcibly taken as a bride and raped (yes that’s what actually happened) by a white settler. 🤢🤮

    How they still have the balls to sell that movie is beyond me.

      • AgreeableLandscapeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Moana: portraying Māui, a revered Hawaiian (and Polynesian in general) cultural and religious figure as the comic relief.

        Mulan: portraying the Dragon, a revered Chinese (and East Asian in general) cultural and religious figure as the comic relief.

        Yeah, those are cute, lovable characters and totally not racist and culturally offensive, right? Imagine the outcry by the West if a Indigenous Hawaiian, or especially Chinese film portrayed Jesus in the same way.

          • AgreeableLandscapeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I genuinely believe that the only thing that saved the Lion King from being just as racist if not more, is that there were no humans for them to make “jokes” about. And there were only a few humans in the Jungle Book, so same boat. Also they didn’t try to “”“adapt”“” a real folktale or other cultural thing from over there.

            I mean, they still used mostly white voice actors for a story set in Africa and India respectively. Animal characters or not, don’t ya think there’s a problem with that?