Hey look the nazi is being dishonest so as to argue in bad faith. Wow. Totally not apropos. Apparently they get to assign me a proper reasoning that I have to prove instead of allowing me to have my own reasons.
You spread nazi propaganda created by nazis to disparage the historic enemies of nazi germany to this day. And that propaganda being created in the first place to downplay the holocaust, you are a holocaust denier. You are a nazi.
You keep making this accusation, but are apparently incapable of actually telling me what has been said that is “Nazi propaganda”
And calling someone a “holocaust denier” for non existent reasons is completely meaningless when you yourself deny multiple genocides.
And yeah it’s not a discussion. It’s me talking to myself while some angry loser shouts random insults in a desperate attempt to make themselves feel morally superior to random on the internet.
So your argument that because the holocaust was so bad, calling any other genocide a genocide makes you a nazi?
If this want such a serious topic I would dying of laughter.
I think it’s selling that you had to dig out a “source” from a completely random person with no credentials posting on a website with no authority on the matter, that also goes against that point and call the genocide in gaza a genocide.
And also points out how many holocaust organisation and researchers DO in fact agree that the holodomor genocide is a genocide.
This logic is so flimsy it’s kind of ridiculous. And if you applied to any other heinous crime, you would openly ridiculed. Like imagine telling a woman she was actually a rape apologist for saying her husband raped her when she told him no, but he continued, because she would be comparing it to a case where a woman was violently raped in an ally by a stranger to the point she died.
Or telling modern victims of slavery that they’re actually just as bad as slavers because they tacitly compare themselves to victims of the African slave trade.
Just because the holocaust is the worst genocide in our history, does mean that there are no other genocides ever. Using the brutality of the holocaust to deny other genocides still just makes you a genocide denier. And also a piece of shit using the horrible deaths of millions of people to try and scapegoat the genocidal maniac you desperately want to shield from all criticism like a demented weirdo.
And even IF we take your source as gospel, it still acknowledges holodomor was a terrible atrocity. And you denying it happened is still just as morally reprehensible, even if we don’t call it a genocide.
Hey look the nazi is being dishonest so as to argue in bad faith. Wow. Totally not apropos. Apparently they get to assign me a proper reasoning that I have to prove instead of allowing me to have my own reasons.
You spread nazi propaganda created by nazis to disparage the historic enemies of nazi germany to this day. And that propaganda being created in the first place to downplay the holocaust, you are a holocaust denier. You are a nazi.
This is not a discussion.
You keep making this accusation, but are apparently incapable of actually telling me what has been said that is “Nazi propaganda”
And calling someone a “holocaust denier” for non existent reasons is completely meaningless when you yourself deny multiple genocides.
And yeah it’s not a discussion. It’s me talking to myself while some angry loser shouts random insults in a desperate attempt to make themselves feel morally superior to random on the internet.
Fucking moron. “Random insults” being literally the same title each time.
Since you’re emotionally and intellectually a fucking baby, here’s the airplane! Open wide! VROOOOOOOOM
https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory
Literally told you the fucking reason in the comment you replied to you fucking bad faith actor fash piece of shit
You fucking wallow in dishonesty.
So your argument that because the holocaust was so bad, calling any other genocide a genocide makes you a nazi?
If this want such a serious topic I would dying of laughter.
I think it’s selling that you had to dig out a “source” from a completely random person with no credentials posting on a website with no authority on the matter, that also goes against that point and call the genocide in gaza a genocide.
https://jewishcurrents.org/can-genocide-studies-survive-a-genocide-in-gaza
And also points out how many holocaust organisation and researchers DO in fact agree that the holodomor genocide is a genocide.
This logic is so flimsy it’s kind of ridiculous. And if you applied to any other heinous crime, you would openly ridiculed. Like imagine telling a woman she was actually a rape apologist for saying her husband raped her when she told him no, but he continued, because she would be comparing it to a case where a woman was violently raped in an ally by a stranger to the point she died.
Or telling modern victims of slavery that they’re actually just as bad as slavers because they tacitly compare themselves to victims of the African slave trade.
Just because the holocaust is the worst genocide in our history, does mean that there are no other genocides ever. Using the brutality of the holocaust to deny other genocides still just makes you a genocide denier. And also a piece of shit using the horrible deaths of millions of people to try and scapegoat the genocidal maniac you desperately want to shield from all criticism like a demented weirdo.
And even IF we take your source as gospel, it still acknowledges holodomor was a terrible atrocity. And you denying it happened is still just as morally reprehensible, even if we don’t call it a genocide.