• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m not sure why its easier, and don’t see how it’s more of a power grab than what Google and Apple already do with their platforms.

        • Arlo Godfrey@fosstodon.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          @yogthos Building walled gardens apps where you control everything is easier than building a walled garden OS where you control everything.

          One is an App and the other is an OS, but both can be turned into a “walled garden trap” for consumers.

          “But they did it” isn’t an excuse to do it more. We have enough of this going around already with Apple and X and WeChat, governments and tech bros trying to maintain control over the masses. Nah.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                I don’t see the OS providing a unified UI that allows people to write apps as services as a problem. I’m likewise confused about what you’re actually try to say here. You’re conflating your ideological stance with technical functionality as far as I can tell. It’s perfectly possible for an open platform to do the same things WeChat does, and that would result in a much better user experience than the current approach. I don’t know why it’s so hard for you to grasp this.

                • Arlo Godfrey@fosstodon.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  @yogthos They literally JUST banned and unbanned Tiktok at the whim of an annoying orange, and Twitter as we knew it is dead because of a rich billionaire.

                  You’re glossing over real problems in the name of good ux.