That should be the biggest argument against the rise of tech bro neo feudalism. Feudalism only has a hierarchy of lesser and greater lords that hold a right to ownership of any kind and have a licence to exploit the peasantry, and everyone else is a serf of no relevance or rights of autonomy or ownership.
The only way feudalism can possibly play out is empoverishment of the masses in the long term.
There are “lesser” and “greater” lords that exploit the “peasants”. There’s the “proletariat” and the “burgeoisie”, with “petit burgeoisie” in-between. There’s the “workers” and the management - “low-” and “high-”. And of course, there’s the classes: “high”, “low” and of course, “middle”.
The way I see it, pretty much whatever system one envisions, there’s the “down-lows”, the “high-ups” and the “in-betweens”, although they may not be called that explicitly. Usually it’s the high class that can be split into two, feudal lords and management alike.