Those non-violent protests shook them so bad they wanted to charge non-violent Quaker protestors with terrorism.

  • interdimensionalmeme
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Peaceful protest, electoralism, those are spooks. If you want to stop something, try physical destruction.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Not opposing your comment at all, more of a rare occurrence fun fact: Even an actual (ie financially or personality effective) show of power is enough sometimes.

      Eg unions in USA haven’t killed any tycoons for the longest time. But they do get a loaf of bread per week more in wages when they stop working for a few days.

      Not all revolutions need to be as complete as the French or Russian (tho that works, but also costs a few years of instability & political power struggles), 10% of the elite de-elited (eg losing their wealth bcs of direct demos actions) would send a big message in USAs case.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Even just for something as mundane as protected bike lanes, I’ve found through personal experience that just a couple instances of direct action against motorists who tried to park in them was infinitely more effective than years of begging peacefully for barriers.