Excerpt:

Prosecutors highlighted “about $10,000 — $8,000 in U.S. dollars and then $2,000 in foreign currency that was found on his person,” CNN correspondent Danny Freeman said following the court hearing.

“Also they said that he had a Faraday bag,” which blocks cell signals, a move that prosecutors alleged marked “an indication of criminal sophistication and reason they should hold him on bail,” Freeman continued.

After prosecutors made the claims, Mangione said he would like to “correct two things.”

“I don’t know where any of that money came from — I’m not sure if it was planted. And also, that bag was waterproof, so I don’t know about criminal sophistication,” the suspect said in a statement that suggested police framed him.

  • NutWrench
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Luigi needs to shut the everloving fark up and let his lawyer do the talking for him. The cops are trolling him with fake evidence and he’s falling for it.

    “The gun WASN’T a 32 caliber, it was a 22 rimfire!” etc, etc.

    • zib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is the correct answer. If you are arrested by police for ANY REASON, the only word in your vocabulary is now “lawyer”. Remember kids, anything you say or do will be used against you.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 day ago

        “I invoke my right to remain silent and have a lawyer.”

        It sucks, but sometimes you have to explicitly state you are exercising your rights. Just staying silent doesn’t mean they won’t stop pestering you with questions. Make it clear and concise that that you are demanding your lawyer be present and any further questioning done should be in violation of that right. But you have to make it clear you are invoking it.

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Not sometimes, but ALWAYS state that you are invoking your right to remain silent.

          Doesn’t matter if it’s one of the states that presumes you are invoking your right, because you might be the court case that decides otherwise this time.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Glad to see this here. In many jurisdictions, if the law doesn’t say it previous rulings do: you must invoke the rights to silence and to counsel.

          It sucks but plenty of judges want to give the police every chance they can get, like those dickheads who OK’d forcing people to unlock their phones because “you already gave police your fingerprint”.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Unless the gun was in the backpack Muad’dib ditched, and the cops just chose a random guy to scapegoat with the evidence they hid.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      While this is generally good advice, it doesn’t apply to public spectacle.

      There’s countless cases in the US where public pressure forced the government to drop charges or at least reduce sentences.

      This guy has support from 99% of the people. Keeping that support is important to his defense.