• umbrella
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    is this generally understood by the general population? especially in the 3rd world countries they manipulate where the connections between local news and pupeteer empire don’t look as close and/or are deliberately obscured…

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, of course not. Never was, nowhere is.

      The wish for “unbiased news” grew from the aftermath of WWI, but didn’t stick with the duopoly in the US.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        that influence extends way past the us political system.

        in a way that makes it look like the center unbiased position, when its in fact very manipulative.

        • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yeah, that’s why we even care that the US has a duopoly.


          This particular thread is largely about “that’s what they consider unbiased news for some reason”

          • umbrella
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            and i was talking about why it is.

            and maybe why explicitly anti-imperialist and anti-us media might sound manipulative to people used to imperialism being the center and not the right. we do need the proper us bad that has been lacking.