Typically when you enter a discussion you don’t do it in a hostile manner.
The discussion point was for the post Red_Scare brought up in my past where I was talking about Democratic VP picks, not the /s comment I made in this thread
Typically when you enter a discussion you don’t do it in a hostile manner.
See the comment you just responded to
Also, unironically believing no science is done in North Korea is a take with the critical thinking behind it of a dying sea-sponge.
You missed the part where I said (multiple times) it was sarcastic
That might be a reason people are being hostile back to you rather than just your general tone considering that you haven’t read the room.
See above
“I think everyone in the world knows this” e.g for direct example incase you question what I mean by “tone”.
Again, see above
Also, democrats absolutely love playing into it. See Obama’s failure to get an actual functioning, proper healthcare system despite the complete power to do so. Look at Biden now. Look at Kamala failing to deliver any actual material responses to working class woes and then proceeding to get a Cheney endorsement and the media begging GEORGE BUSH for one.
I don’t really know what you’re talking about here tbh. Maybe my comment about Republicans? In any case, again, my comment was sarcastic, so “see above”
To boost what Red_Scare said, if two communist countries are trading to lower malnutrition than a capitalist nation with global extraction and economic/military hegemony; isn’t that a good thing? Like why is that a criticism?
Of course that’s a good thing, see above
Happy I responded to your “other parts” now? I guess this is why people need /s.
Ah, I misinterpreted your “sarcastic” as in more so scornful/spiteful sarcastic rather than making humor. It’s my bad because I do have issues with sarcasm from lemmy accounts because you never know, even .ml and I tend to assume lib brainworms. Sorry then.
The discussion point was for the post Red_Scare brought up in my past where I was talking about Democratic VP picks, not the /s comment I made in this thread
deleted by creator
Sure, let me respond to them.
See the comment you just responded to
You missed the part where I said (multiple times) it was sarcastic
See above
Again, see above
I don’t really know what you’re talking about here tbh. Maybe my comment about Republicans? In any case, again, my comment was sarcastic, so “see above”
Of course that’s a good thing, see above
Happy I responded to your “other parts” now? I guess this is why people need /s.
Ah, I misinterpreted your “sarcastic” as in more so scornful/spiteful sarcastic rather than making humor. It’s my bad because I do have issues with sarcasm from lemmy accounts because you never know, even .ml and I tend to assume lib brainworms. Sorry then.