• queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Anarchism can’t defend itself. That’s the point. Either it gets coopted and recuperated under capital, or it gets hijacked by reactionary forces for their own purposes.

    • Zloubida@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      While Marxism-Leninism gets hijacked by reactionary forces for their own purposes and gets recuperated under capital after that.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        The USSR lost the Cold War, but there’s plenty of ML counties still around. I’m sure you’ll whine they aren’t paradises, but they’re all generally progressing and developing in a positive direction (when they aren’t being strangled to death like Cuba)

        Not a lot of anarchist spaces by comparison. There’s the Zapatistas and they’re pretty cool, but like, the record is pretty clear.

        • Zloubida@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 minutes ago

          And before the end of the cold war, USSR was a reactionary country governed by an elite for its own interests. It’s the same in China. The same in Vietnam, the same in Cuba (but at least there they have the excuse of the unjust US politics against them).