CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 hours agoSupreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett approaching the Confederate States of America stance that West Virginia is an illegitimate state that should not existhexbear.netimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1103arrow-down10
arrow-up1103arrow-down1imageSupreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett approaching the Confederate States of America stance that West Virginia is an illegitimate state that should not existhexbear.netCoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 hours agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-square_pilinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·6 hours agoListen everything Scalia wrote was ideologically consistent because it used the same verbiage as Bush V Gore, “limited to present circumstances”.
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·4 hours agoah, a personal favorite, this ruling sets no precedent because I decided it doesn’t The kind of thing produced by a very real and legitimate court system and definitely not just 9 unaccountable, unelected elders making decisions on a whim.
minus-squarebarrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 hours agoBut remember, we can’t stack the court with 50 zoomer maoists because people would “lose faith” in the “institutions”.
Listen everything Scalia wrote was ideologically consistent because it used the same verbiage as Bush V Gore, “limited to present circumstances”.
ah, a personal favorite,
this ruling sets no precedent because I decided it doesn’t
The kind of thing produced by a very real and legitimate court system and definitely not just 9 unaccountable, unelected elders making decisions on a whim.
But remember, we can’t stack the court with 50 zoomer maoists because people would “lose faith” in the “institutions”.