• AntiOutsideAktion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    24 minutes ago

    Anyone and everyone who got taken in by that particular piece of propaganda is a grade A moron.

    Why are you accepting the framing that Israel NEEDS TO AGREE to a ceasefire rather than it’s something that can be imposed on it by refusing to send more weapons?

    Because [redacted] dumb.

    • JonsJava@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hey. Moderator here. Your attack on their intelligence is a rule violation. Please either delete this comment, or update it so you’re not insulting somebody. If you don’t in 2 hours, I will be forced to delete your comment. If you continue down this path, you will receive a temporary ban.

      • AntiOutsideAktion
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 minutes ago

        shut up weirdo

        second mod from the bottom and already a whole cop affectation/persona to match the “edit this in two hours” projection of never logging off

        log off

    • davidagain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      (I deleted that comment because I accidentally posted it twice. It’s one of the other replies to your post.)

      NYT thinks Israel has a massive stockpile of weapons, other suppliers and actually recently exported a record value of arms in the year containing the October 7 attack and the insane obliterative war that Israel launched in response. I don’t think Israel is worried about running out of weapons any time soon, because they’ve opened up another front against Lebanon!

      You know who could stop the war today? Netanyahu. Do you know who’s telling him not to stop on the phone, on a regular basis? Trump. He even boasts of it.

      taken in… grade A moron… you’re dumb.

      I don’t appreciate being called names just because you disagree with me, and I don’t think it strengthens your case that you resort to that as a debating tactic.

      • AntiOutsideAktion
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        I’m not disagreeing with you about a matter of opinion or ideology. I’m disagreeing with you on a matter of basic critical thinking and awareness of the material reality of the situation. On the former you have a point. On the latter it’s a disservice to the overall discourse to give you so much grace as to not call you an idiot. Your views on this matter are not valid and there is a correct answer.