Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoAfter all, how far inland could a hurricane go?lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1906arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1898arrow-down1imageAfter all, how far inland could a hurricane go?lemmy.blahaj.zoneCatoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square150fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaretetris11linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 hours agoinform me then, otherwise I’m just going to propagate whatever specific thing you’re vaguely objecting to
minus-squareMjpasta710@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 minutes agoThe words you’ve suggested are more objectionable than the word you’re objecting to. If you want to claim a position of supremacy and justice in linguistic expression, you should educate yourself on the words you’re choosing to use. I’m not asserting that the word removed is more objectionable than any other ‘curse’ word. You’re claiming that.
inform me then, otherwise I’m just going to propagate whatever specific thing you’re vaguely objecting to
The words you’ve suggested are more objectionable than the word you’re objecting to.
If you want to claim a position of supremacy and justice in linguistic expression, you should educate yourself on the words you’re choosing to use.
I’m not asserting that the word removed is more objectionable than any other ‘curse’ word.
You’re claiming that.