• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was very clearly replying to this statement claiming that Russia has supposedly outlines lots of previous red lines that have been broken.

    Russia claiming X means war with NATO has been a bit of a recurring theme throughout the war.

    Are you just intentionally ignoring the context here?

    • inlandempire@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      No I believe you’re being intellectually disingenuous, because you’re now paraphrasing the comment you responded to, to try and twist the argument in your favour, the previous interaction was :

      • Russia claiming X means war with NATO has been a bit of a recurring theme throughout the war.

      To which you directly replied

      • Please do provide a previous official quote from Russia stating that. I’ll save you the trouble though, cause it doesn’t exist.

      I’m not sure I quite like where this is going and I’m not in the mood for arguing over such a minimal thing, so I’d like to end the interaction here, see ya around !

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not twisting anything here. I’ve been very clear regarding the specific point I was making. The context of this whole thread is that the use of long range weapons do do deep strikes is the one clear red line that Russia articulated. The fact that you’re trying to twist this into something else shows that you’re the one being intellectually dishonest here. Bye.