• Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wonder why books published by an Anticommunist country that went through a decades long scare would have anticommunist grifters with anticommunist opinions. I am also curious why said anticommunists also happen to be islamophobic, pro-NATO, Zionist, pro-Imperialism, and have ties to the Military Industrial Complex.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Khlevniuk is Russia. Not that I’d consider the nationality the thing I use to judge historians.

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        We are talking about Martin McCauley, who wrote Stalin and Stalinism.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          We were talking about them both. You chose to focus on only one of them, despite both making the claim about Stalin being a dictator.

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Because I didn’t bother with the second after realizing you believe a fascist-written opinion piece to be worthy of respect.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I was under the impression it was the claims we were discussing, which Khlevniuk’s book seem to support, not what or who deserves our respect. For that reason it might be worthwhile to check that out too. Totally up to you of course.

              • Cowbee [he/they]
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Respect, as in accept the opinions. Nothing you have shown has supported the idea that Stalin could not be opposed, and was not opposed, nor that he was all-powerful.

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  We were talking about whether Stalin was a dictator or not. Khlevniuk’s Stalin: A New Biography of a Dictator makes that case.

                  Stalin could not be opposed, and was not opposed, nor that he was all-powerful.

                  Even Hitler wasn’t a dictator on those grounds. And I think he is considered the epitome of a modern day dictator.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    What is a dictator, in your opinion? What separates a dictator from a regular head of state?