• _NoName_
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 个月前

    Title’s hard click bait. It leads up to talking about Arrow’s Impossibility theorem, which sets forth some explicit rules for defining a fair election, and communicates that all finite-vote systems are dictatorships that fail to meet those criteria, including ranked choice voting. Arrow’s theorem also uses ‘dictatorship’ in a pretty weird technical fashion, meaning that one individual can technically sway any election with their sole choices.

    Directly after, though, Veritasium does acknowledge that Duncan Black pokes holes in the actual value of Arrow’s theorem, by showing that many ordinal voting systems will still favor majority preference, and that Arrow’s theorem does not apply to rated voting systems like approval voting and STAR voting.

    It’s pretty bizarre that he decided to make such a click-baity title and front-load only skim over the better solution at the end, right near election month.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 个月前

      Derek made a video years several back where he admits that they ran tests on their videos and that using click bait titles made their videos preform far better. So here we are.

      • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        Thats what happens when you have algorithms promote content based on click-through rate and engagement metrics. Creators have to use click-bait and sensationalism to get their content to spread. Its common knowledge at this point. I can’t think of any sizable creators that don’t use this, and generally the more they abuse it, the larger the channel.