• carl_marks[use name]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    thought it would be obvious I was mocking you by repeating the viewpoint you expressed without the air of pretentiousness that you surround it with, but I guess I was the stupid one for thinking you were capable of recognizing sarcasm.

    I see you’re like arguing with strawmen in your head

    Also “critical support” for what, Russian imperialism? Why does Russian imperialism deserve “critical support” while western imperialism deserves direct opposition?

    That’s what I’m asking you dumbass lol why can you lend western imperialism critical support and not to Russia? Maybe figure out the term and how it’s defined before speaking on it?

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Kindly point out where I expressed critical support for western imperialism.

      • carl_marks[use name]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sorry, I was under the impression you were speaking in favor of NATO expansion and think that while the US is bad, it’s emdevours in Ukraine are just (this time).

        Also “critical support” for what, Russian imperialism? Why does Russian imperialism deserve “critical support” while western imperialism deserves direct opposition?

        Revolutionary defeatism

        Recognizing that yes, Putin’s Russia is a bourgeois state with highly questionable rights for sexual minorities and a husk of its former Soviet glory, its re-nationalized industries are a target for the US imperialist emdevours ripe to be privatized again. (You can see how the NATO supports racist nawalny,.but not the largest opposition force in Russia instead, etc.)

        To understand the geopolitical context of the NATO proxy war in Ukraine against Russia it helps to watch the Mearsheimer lecture on it (hardly Russian propaganda)

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4

        Also Ben Norton gives a solid breakdown here

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhajzlhcgSk

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Let me approach this from a different angle. If a military defeat is necessary to create revolutionary conditions, is it not then in the best interest of the working class in each imperialist power for the other to win, and does that not then put the working class in each imperialist power at odds with one another?

          Don’t you believe in internationalism? Solidarity?

          How many hundreds of thousands of lives does it cost to create revolutionary conditions, and how can you be so arrogant as to cheer while they’re fed into the meatgrinder, believing with such certainty that it means you’ll get your chance at revolution?

          • carl_marks[use name]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            If a military defeat is necessary to create revolutionary conditions, is it not then in the best interest of the working class in each imperialist power for the other to win,

            Yes?

            and does that not then put the working class in each imperialist power at odds with one another?

            Yes I would like the war to end asap and not to see Ukraines working class be forced into the meat grider to fight the imperialists fight…

            Don’t you believe in internationalism? Solidarity?

            Yes?

            How many hundreds of thousands of lives does it cost to create revolutionary conditions, and how can you be so arrogant as to cheer while they’re fed into the meatgrinder, believing with such certainty that it means you’ll get your chance at revolution?

            That’s such a perverted misrepresentation of material reality I’m not even sure where to begin. 1) Analysis does not mean justification. That’s your interpretation of it. 2) where am I cheering it on? You make it sound like I endorse it when in fact it’s NATO and it’s proponents 3) heightend contradictions improve condition for revolution is a basic historical fact…

        • Vilian@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          When they point “NATO expansionism”, you know that any logical discussion is beyond hope