Nah, their brains are parallelized and treat each argument as a seperate process. Since information is stored as private for each in process, they can’t access certain talking points for certain arguments. If you bring up information that the current argument isn’t privileged to access, they have to switch to an argument that does have access, at which point they can’t access the previous argument’s information.
If they didn’t have this design, rogue processes might be able to cause sensitive information to be accessed by unprivileged users (normie users don’t have the privilege to see data of white power users), or worse, you could get a pointer loop in their memory addresses which could lead to a system lock-up. /j
I think it’s not that they hold more positions, its that they have no room for complexity or nuance, it would unravel them, but they have unlimited capacity for avoiding self criticism
deleted by creator
George Orwell had word for that.
They’re quantum dumbasses
Doublethink.
Nah, their brains are parallelized and treat each argument as a seperate process. Since information is stored as private for each in process, they can’t access certain talking points for certain arguments. If you bring up information that the current argument isn’t privileged to access, they have to switch to an argument that does have access, at which point they can’t access the previous argument’s information.
If they didn’t have this design, rogue processes might be able to cause sensitive information to be accessed by unprivileged users (normie users don’t have the privilege to see data of white power users), or worse, you could get a pointer loop in their memory addresses which could lead to a system lock-up. /j
I think it’s not that they hold more positions, its that they have no room for complexity or nuance, it would unravel them, but they have unlimited capacity for avoiding self criticism