The ZimaBoard is a small, fanless computer powered by a 6-watt Intel Apollo Lake processor with support for hard drives and SSDs. Apart from having an Intel CPU (vs an ARM processor) this computer also has 2x SATA III, 1x PCIe 2.0 and 2x Gigabit Ethernet ports to set it apart from a Raspberry Pi. So it is more readily usable with expanded storage capabilities and dual networking. It is also a lot cheaper than buying an Intel NUC with a single network port.

It can be used as a media server, software router, personal cloud, VPN and Firewall, smart home monitoring, file sharing and collaboration applications, embedded projects, or personal server applications.

Yes it will cost more than a Pi, and it is a Kickstarter project (with 20% off the final retail price), but I see DBTech has just received one to review on YouTube, so it does actually exist.

See https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/icewhaletech/zimaboard-single-board-server-for-creators

#technology #server #zimaboard #raspberrypi #hardware

  • krolden
    link
    12 years ago

    I’m sure a raspberry pi cm4 compares plenty well to this aged celeron. Plus is way more dynamic in that you can use it in any number of carriers that work best for you, or you can just design your own.

    Also I never said it would be competing with enterprise gear. If you’re going to have it running as a server, there’s no doubt in my mind its going to hang on reboot likely sooner rather than later. So that means you’re gonna have to pull it out and hook it up to a display, etc. Not even a serial console.

    Also ‘hackable’ is literally in the title of zimaboard.com. there’s plenty of small footprint x86 shit in the world that we dont need more.

    • GadgeteerZAOP
      link
      12 years ago

      It is more than just the CPU though - I basically had to abandon using my Pi 4 as a home server because connecting the drives to it were problematic. I went with an Intel NUC in the end (yes a Celeron). The barebones NUC cost a lot more actually. But I can say my Intel NUC with the Celeron runs for weeks on end without hanging at all, and it has a good many apps running on it.

      The Zimaboard is still pretty good value for what you get I think. But I’m mentioning it here as one interesting option. I’m certainly not stating this is the one everyone should use. People must evaluate it as merely one of their available options. Every time I buy new hardware, I short-list a good 5 options for a more detailed analysis before buying.

      With the ever spiralling cost of new CPU’s which must be matched with a motherboard, I think we’re going to have x86 and ARM around for a long time still, as they get many small scale jobs done at a really low price point.

      • krolden
        link
        12 years ago

        Exactly, you used a nuc. There’s thousands of nucs of multiple generations around already and they are equal to if not better than this board.

        Also the cm4 has pcie which makes it much easier to add many storage options.

        • GadgeteerZAOP
          link
          12 years ago

          I’d still do a proper evaluation before buying again next time. I would never just assume the NUC is better. It depends on what I need to do, and the cost as well. I had looked at a NUC last year for my daughter, and noted they had got very pricey.

          • krolden
            link
            22 years ago

            Better is relative but ive seen nucs in thrift stores for ten bucks. Doubt you’ll ever even see a zimaboard.

            I guess I hope it isn’t vaporware but that’s probably just because I want all these other really cool looking boards losing support immediately after they ship (if they even do ship). That’s why I like the compute module stuff, its much easier to design, fab, and fund than a whole SoC SBC.