• InputZero
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s interesting watching the discussion in this thread evolving and polarizing. Yesterday the discussion started as ‘nuclear is one solution in a portfolio of solutions to combat climate change. vs. nuclear is always bad.’ and developed into ‘nuclear is good and you’re dumb. vs. nuclear is bad and you’re evil’.

    • ShugarSkull@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s also really weird because discussing a topic like this is heavily impacted by where you come from. For exemple the discussion about nuclear energy cannot be the same in France, China, USA or Russia and I see almost everyone here talking the thing like the choice between Nuclear Energy or not (because it’s should never be about Nuclear Energy or Renewable Energy) was the same everywhere on the planet.

      So here we are, a lot of people talking to themselves instead of talking with each other, hammering their idea on the topic without even once considering that others living in others places and living in others conditions will approach the subject differently (and than it should be normal and comprehensible)

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Seems like that’s how every large scale “discussion” on the internet goes, all nuance goes out the window. I guess the platforms don’t allow for nuanced takes? Other than maybe longform podcasts, but those aren’t exactly large scale discussions like reddit or twitter. Maybe some clever sociologist can figure out why we are like this (or likely already has).