• carl_marks[use name]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    they use the Chinese numbers in official declarations because you know its official. that’s why there are these round about ways to try and find out what the real numbers

    that cognitive dissonance lol

    you seem to forget that everyday people used property as investment and now there investment is worthless

    don’t buy property as investment? The sinking of prices is an intended effect. Also the gvmnt forces evergrande to finish building homes tho…

    its a dictatorship thing. making your economy look better then what it actually is.

    I agree that the US is trying to make the economy look better than it actually is

    • beaxingu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      and you where saying i was coping.

      property became a replacement for the stock-marked because the Chinese stock market is very volatile and the property market was only going up that’s why some people had like 3 apartments because they could sell it again at a better price. property became a short term investment and was used like stocks that could never go down.

      okay dude if you think dictatorships are better at transparency that’s not my problem.

      • carl_marks[use name]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes your cope is just so good. Here you have a good Bloomberg article on the validity of numbers: https://archive.md/lxpMa you might learn a thing of two.

        property became a replacement for the stock-marked because the Chinese stock market is very volatile and the property market was only going up that’s why some people had like 3 apartments because they could sell it again at a better price. property became a short term investment and was used like stocks that could never go down.

        Yes? I’m not saying this did not happen? I’m saying that because the property market bubbled and the CPC didn’t want it to get too bad they let it burst early and introduced the “three red lines”. Now property prices are affordable again…

        okay dude if you think dictatorships are better at transparency that’s not my problem.

        Implying that we have the same understanding of “dictatorships”

        • beaxingu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          they first incentivized the bubble with cheap Loans so that they could jack up there GDP numbers. then when people started too use property as a investment tool like stocks because now you could not loose but was creating a lot of debt. so much that even the ccp could not let the debt grow because remember this was still helping there GDP numbers. then they introduced the “three red lines” because even for them it was creating too much debt. but of course only after a whole lot of people invested and counted on it never going down and over payed on these shitty apartments that where now a stand in for stocks. its not about property prices being affordable its about that people used property as investment and put a lot of there savings in overpriced apartments that are now worthless. and as a side effect nobody trusts the property marked anymore just like how they don’t trust the stock marked anymore.

          no implying that we have different understandings about how important transparency is. there is non in dictatorships. but hey if that’s your thing that’s your thing but if that shit blows up in your face you have only yourself too blame.