Following this banned content and this discussion: provide that “fascism-communism equivalence” and “horse-shoe theory” serve only to legitimize fascists, would you (@all) find clearer adding to the policy that this kind of content is not welcome on this instance?
I draw a concrete example: the concept of free speech has been stretched by online trolls and scoundrels to hegemonize online communities and to justify any of their behaviours. At some point, online communities understood free speech is a tool to destroy them from inside, therefore put its advocacy out of terms. Does it make them againt free speech? No.
I deem we should do the same move for horse-shoe theory.
Time, attention, and patience are limited resources and shall be allocated according to community goals (being the code of conduct a manifestation of these goals).
In the end, my arguments are by scarsity and by expectation.