• octopus_ink
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    No more gun ownership for him, nor voting rights (in most states). He’s removed himself from the most important parts of political discourse.

    I agree with your sentiment, but neither of those matters to someone who a) doesn’t respect the results of an election and b) is OK with insurrection.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure it does. That future traffic stop where they would have gotten away with a misdemeanor speeding ticket now turns into a felony firearms charge in itself.

      I suppose it could be describe as: their footprint for anonymity has drastically shrunk now. Any infraction under the law will be examined in microscopic detail not just by federal officials but even local law enforcement. Any consequence is now magnified 10 fold.

      • octopus_ink
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s a great point I wasn’t thinking it through.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s sounds good, but in practice we’ve seen that law enforcement, especially local ones, don’t enforce gun restrictions, if they even know about them.

        The recent mass shooter in Maine could have easily been yellow flagged and had his guns removed, but police didn’t. And now the one deemed responsible for ignoring the warnings it’s running for a sheriff leadership position there.

        And how many of the insurrectionists were actual current and former local law enforcement officers?