not yet right now,

hilarious by those outputs.

But still, sooner maybe, as long as AI keeps learning and improving and advancing, it may come true sadly.

I more believe that physics governs economies. Meanwhile, economics provides insights into how the resources are done by physics.

Poolrooms!

Establishing a count system for user profile will provide more competitive fake and shitty racing posts and comments. Better without it here, thus more real and humane discussions.

He rip out not only the great marketing artifact but also the users’ sentiment from seeing the bird logo reminding them of how long they’ve used the site which is now shockingly changing.

Once the celebrities or official pages or figure people leave that site for its dismaying complications, that will be the doom of it as followers of those don’t have other significant reasons to stay.

deleted by creator

obviously sh*tty propaganda what a ridiculous foolishness is he?

deleted by creator

It becomes an already apparent reminder: Beware of what you see on the Internet (as if beware of who you meet and what you hear from them)—Never just trust ahead (but don’t be afraid already to ever encounter because there are efficient and convenient ways to outwit and bust those malbots as I believe we humans can think, debunk and dissect info to truth.)

But sadly to some degree, real online people have scarily begun intentionally/mischievously asking other real online people whether if the others’ texts are AI-generated or not, without even comprehending first what every of those texts is aiming (maybe, they are not actually well edified to media literacy or reading contexts deeply.)

I’ve experienced that someone rushed questioned my comment if it were AI-generated or not (instead of why I said or even what was my straight-out point) that made me confused into pissed to badly confront once (and never again) as I have no idea how I could better respond and then prove (Even I told the truth that I made my comment all myself straight from my core & concern despite my vibrant embarrassing writing, I bet nothing would ever change as people would always still doubt upon the permanent question, and I should better end up in silence next time ever if no better options yet.)

Summer Boomers/June Boomers like me.

This is for the first time in my real Internet life that someone interrogates my comment (maybe also my real existence) whether if it’s written by AI or not. 🤣😂🤯😭

Lololol but so sad and eerie that netizens have begun to fear of contexts and contents they see on Internet and offline+tangible media probably maliciously generated by AI I hope not (I understand and also experience).

I should embrace and be cleverly prepared to this hardly grasped phenomenon that I’ve been worrying of and never been liking, to my perspective, the coming of real cultural information age.

SEOs, search engine optimizations. (Only devs not me 😩 could do that)

Keep upvoting for algorithm. Keep updating to never die. Keep disseminating to those unheard. Keep EDUCATING. So people on Internet will eventually get ourselves the insight to ponder and make (mass and individual) actions on ourselves (cause only us the mass will steer a happening and slap his stubborness).

Should never let this go down and covered.

I bet that this video/problem will never solve/succeed if people do not become considerate and woke but just read and passby from this. Protests seem not working to my perspectives. But, mass (compliant and infallible) actions ensures changes.

And also a polka-dotted somewhat colorblind quiz to determine a number/letter formed on polka dots or sometimes scatters of randomly colored and assorted shapes.

I encountered a quiz (I forgot what’s called) on a website (I forgot also its name) to determine which of following audios does change a speaker’s voice in the middle of his narration/speech. So it requires keen hearing and delicate recognition of voice/speech characteristics (timbre, texture, intonation, accent, articulation, pacing, mood etc…). I’m have no idea if malbots could determine whosever voices will be.

The only instance I can think of Karma being beneficial is in highly specific forums where user reputation could be an important metric for new users, or those seeking info. Very limited.

A very good function for a real credible user particularly accrediting real professions/experts in such knowledge/education (still it does not guarantee an infallible and reliable info ahead, so still requiring thorough fact-checking, critical thinking and crystal clear pondering. At least, it will ease enough for naive users to identify who are admirable and who are sus. Think of Youtube channel counts of subscribers, likes and total views into a positive outcome.)

But also, for cons, it’s not good as a policy to gatekeep low-count (innocent😭) users from freely posting on busy and crowded communities (mods [cause they’re humans and volunteers] have preferred that so they’ll ease filtering “thousands” of comments of “hundred-thousands” of post, just aiming baneful and deceiving trolls away from communities, but not so efficiently after all.)

Is it possible to communicate to the real mods (not from the company) for OP’s favor to introduce that Lemmy community? Why not reach and private talk to them? Why not the mods themselves to introduce it?

Also suggestion:

Why not flood advertize Lemmy/etc… by many many supporting users on every sub on that website through posts and comments (would affect to storage space and content-analysis-for-AI)? Let’s see if those really fake insecure company pretending to be mods could keep that.

I’m thinking of this that it becomes a challenge to admins of instances(servers) to deal malbots registering into these. If an admin fails to terminate or many registered malbots are found in his instance, poor server will be disjoined by Fediverse (sounds harsh).

Btw, I don’t like to call “instance” (I can’t imagine/picture of anything). I prefer calling “server” (I could imagine as separated CPUs connected by networks).