

My only thought is there’s an Amazon fulfillment centre there for Calgary and area, but like, Calgary is still one hell of a random Canadian place to put you.
My only thought is there’s an Amazon fulfillment centre there for Calgary and area, but like, Calgary is still one hell of a random Canadian place to put you.
As someone from near by to Balzac, that is one hell of an abscure place to put you. I think theres exactly 10 people that live there and there’s some giant malls. That’s about it.
I just looked on wiki and it says population 1 person.
It defaults to master if your account existed before the change I believe.
At least I had to manually change it.
That’s… Not actually a reasonse to what was said?
Sure, that’s all fine and dandy. But it doesn’t change the point that was being made.
The election happened. Here and now, Russia and China tracking me is no different than the US. They’re all authoritarian governments hell bent on stripping rights away.
Now I’m not the same person you replied to. I’m in Canada, so I’m weary of all of them. But if I was in the states, I’d RATHER give my data to an advisory that won’t do much with it. As apposed to the current government hellbent on making life for me and my trans siblings as hard and difficult as possible.
Foreign ownership is just a thing. You don’t need a residence to own anything. Same here in Canada.
From there, you get 6 months visitors visas every year.
Yes, but reading the page tells you they’ve gotten google to open-source PebbleOS and highly suggests they’re either going to maintain the open source version, or otherwise fork the code.
So instead of going “I should also get these benefits as well, I should fight for them” you go “no it’s the other workers who are wrong to have more benefits”.
Interesting.
Would that make it okay if that wild rant was true?
The devil doesn’t need advocates. He’s president.
Most platforms proxy media shared.
Then your proposed workaround is still 1 click more than the reported one.
I have yet to hear anyone irl that identifies as left that actually wants to hear what the right has to say.
Right now it’s all hate and bigotry. Which has no place in society as far as I’m concerned.
The only people I’ve seen concerned with people Hering out the right, are people on the right. “Centrists” are just right wing sympathizers.
So yes, I don’t think they’re actually left leaning.
I agree with the comment your replying to. It’s very fellow kids. It’s not how most people on the left talk.
Note: not the person you replied to.
Ubisoft isn’t the victim here, consumers buying broken games are.
So what, you think they shouldn’t be reviewed bad for a broken game?
No, it’s broken and shouldn’t be for sale if they’re not going to fix it.
Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It’s the territory.
It’s almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies.
Wow that was such a garbage take.
Sure
But when people are replying to
https://lemm.ee/comment/17210238
Saying that anyone not calling out Microsoft is biased, is a bad take. And I’m not sure what your point of more context is needed?
A broken game gets negative reviews. I’m not sure what’s biased about this.
Yes! That’s a very common use case for VPNs in the corporate world.
So tailscale client, the apps you actually download are open source. What’s not open source is the server side code.
Because the interface of tailscale is publicly known and available, someone went and made an open source server side version compatible with tailscale clients.
What’s tail scale?
It’s an easy to use VPN. I can expose just my server to the vpn and my community can easily gain access.
That yes, it doesn’t bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft.
If Ubisoft doesn’t update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don’t like it they should de list it so people don’t pay money for a broken product.
So, people should leave positive reviews for games that no longer work?
Like I get what your saying. It’s not Ubisoft’s fault.
But if they’re not going to fix their old game, than it should be reviewed negatively so people don’t spend money on a game that no longer works.
If they don’t want that, than delist it.
Companies aren’t people. So yes, my limit is “skin deep”.
(Not the person you replied to).
But again, how is that any different to me, as a Canadian, than an American social media company?
All of that is still true.
All the US companies have kissed the ring and are bowing to facsim.
Western social media still has its own agenda. And it’s not human Rights either.