• 18 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle







  • To resist an organized group, you communicate the problem (in an anarchist society, communicating the problem of a nascent state seems like the easy part), present evidence of the nature and severity of the problem, and ask people and existing organizations to mobilize.

    Whether the next step is obstructing the state peacefully or mass production of munitions, would already depend on how bad the state has got.


  • perestroika@lemm.eetoLefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comOh no, Anarchists!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The same that stops them from taking over a democracy. Sometimes.

    If a society became anarchist enough to abolish state structures, there obviously had to exist a reason - there had to exist popular support.

    Thus, someone attempting to recreate a state would face questions and opposition. People would try to persuade them of their error. If they declared a state, anarchists would not recognize it. If it claimed sovereignity above a territory, anarchists might not recognize that either.

    The new state might encounter problems - unwilling residents would leave and be accepted in anarchy, annoyed anarchists would organize trade boycotts and sanctions, ultimately it could go badly and armed confrontation could follow. In some scenarios, the state might remain and attract people who want to live there. In some scenarios, war would follow - and if the majority really was anarchist, the state would lose and disappear.



  • Jälle mingid natsid välja ujunud, oligi liiga kaua vaikne pärast Odini tolguseid. :(

    Kahjuks võin kinnitada rühmituse olemasolu ning kanda nende saldole ka ühe kakluse (kus üks tuttav osalema pidi) ning tõenäoliselt ka kuskil toimunud sümboolika sodimise. Tänavu jõudsid nad ka kapo aastaraamatusse.

    Siin on pmst paar asja, mida inimene tänavalt teha saab.

    • Kui näed, et keegi natsleb, kritiseeri ja selgita, et nii pole normaalne.
    • Kui isik on tuttav, võib proovida küsida küsimusi. Jutluse pidamine enamasti inimest normaalseks ei päästa, aga küsimus selle kohta, millel tema arvates ta arvamus põhineb, ja kas see on ikka tõene - võib helgemal hetkel talle meelde tulla.
    • Kui paistab, et asi on ohtlik, siis sellega tegelemiseks on politsei.

    Mõnel maal, kus probleemid on suuremad, on muide eksperimenteeritud deradikaliseerumise tugirühmadega, pakkumaks abi gängist ära tulemisega.

    Mina loodan, et liikumine sureb välja. See on 95% tõenäoline - hästi palju poliitilisi liikumisi surevad iseenesest välja süstemaatiliste siseprobleemide tõttu. Natsid ei hiilga toreda organisatsioonikultuuriga, mistõttu natsiliikumisi sureb tavalisest rohkemgi välja. Lähevad omavahel raksu, tihti on seltskond ka piisavalt vägivaldne, et natsi suurim vaenlane on teine nats löögiriistaga.

    Kui ei sure välja, eks siis millalgi hakkavad avalikult pead tõstma ja piire kompama. Anarhistina tean et minusugused on kahjuks siis eesliinitöötajad, kellele üritatakse kallale kippuda ja kes vastu tegutsevad, kui politsei tihtipeale veel õndsa und magab. Õnneks on nii, et kus leidub natsi, seal leidub ka rohtu natsi vastu. Soome kolleegid on pidanud asjaga tegelema ja mõnevõrra abi on leitud süva-ajakirjandusest - põhjalikult tausta uurimisest, et iga nats nägupidi tuntud oleks. Jah, seaduse piirimail ja natsile kindlasti veidi hirmutav. Potentsiaalsele natsile - hoiatav, sõnumiga “ära nende sekka mine, nende üle peetakse ühekaupa arvet”.





  • Having once worked on an open source project that dealt with providing anonymity - it was considered the duty of the release engineer to have an overview of all code committed (and to ask questions, publicly if needed, if they had any doubts) - before compiling and signing the code.

    On some months, that was a big load of work and it seemed possible that one person might miss something. So others were encouraged to read and report about irregularities too. I don’t think anyone ever skipped it, because the implications were clear: “if one of us fails, someone somewhere can get imprisoned or killed, not to speak of milder results”.

    However, in case of an utility not directly involved with functions that are critical for security - it might be easier to pass through the sieve.


  • Can confirm, it did happen and was on the front page a few years ago. :)

    To make the story even more interesting, the wolf (released into nature with a GPS tracker collar) traveled over a hundred kilometers northward (they don’t typically roam so much) and was poached a few months later. Authorities tried finding the person involved in illegal hunting, but were unable to figure it out.






  • Both of you are right.

    It’s difficult, but how difficult depends on the task you set. If the task is “maintain manually initiated target lock on a clearly defined object on an empty field, despite the communications link breaking for 10 seconds” -> it is “give a team of coders half a year” difficult. It’s been solved before, the solution just needs re-inventing and porting to a different platform.

    If it’s “identify whether an object is military, whether it is frienly or hostile, consider if it’s worth attacking, and attack a camouflaged target in a dense forest”, then it’s currently not worth trying.



  • perestroika@lemm.eetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldincredible
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    No conclusive proof. It didn’t have a passthrough for one electrode of the two. It did have remains of acid inside and corrosion on the electrodes. One can speculate whether it was an experimental device, a faulty device or something else entirely (one alchemist trying to replicate another’s secrets and doing it wrong?).

    To add insult to the injury, it was lost or stolen during the war in 2003, so more analysis can’t be done until it gets re-discovered. :o

    I haven’t heard an alternative hypothesis, though… I try to imagine what else besides electrochemistry would one do with two dissimilar metals in an acid. It ruins the metals, it doesn’t make any known medicine or effective poison, it likely fouls the jug too… for a person to put copper and iron into a jug full of acid, there has to be a reason for doing it…



  • Jah, nüüdseks (õhtuks) on Saaremaalt 7-sentimeetrisest rahe “terast” pildid ja mõnel autol klaasid sees, mõnel majal vist ka päikesepaneelid purud ja muud lisaks. Sõitis nagu rongiga kagust loodesse, tõmbas Lätis mõned põllud madalaks ja peksis põllumehe vaeseomaks, siis läks Sõrve säärele laastama ja siis tegi erikülastuse Hiiumaale.

    Halb, et tegi. Hea et kusagil tiheda asustusega kesklinnas ei tõmmanud sellist rahet käima.

    Minu päikesepaneelid on kõik terved, aga osade allesjäämine ei olnud päris kindel. Vertikaalpaneele rahe ei võta, küll aga ülespoole vaatavaid. Maapealsetele kaldpaneelidele pean leidma vertikaalseks keeramise viisi (või tegema ümber vertikaalseks paigalduseks… siis jääb rahe energiast paneeli külge vaid väike osa… katuse omadega on vist keerulisem. Mõtlen juba paar tundi taustal lahendust välja, aga lihtsat lahendust ei paista. Paistab kihtplastiku peale kleepimise tüüpi lahendusi… ehk siis jube töömahukaid.






  • None of these countries would permit an abortion at 28 weeks, let alone let her keep the babies remains.

    The article sheds no light on why she needed a late-term abortion. If something is permissible and publicly funded, chances are a person gets it done early, in a clinic, without hesitation. In case of wanting an abortion, delay is harmful, having to travel, smuggle something or fear something (or gather money) is harmful. Also note: those countries have a separate schedule for normal and exceptional conditions. Which is generally not possible in a political environment that has banned abortion (some cities in Nebraska - yes, in the US, cities can regulate abortion, very strange for me). Some examples that I know of:

    Estonia:

    • under normal conditions, 12 weeks
    • under exceptional conditions, 22 weeks (risk to health, severe foetal disease, raising the child is prevented by health or sanity, the pregnant is under 15 or over 45)

    Finland:

    • under normal conditions, 12 weeks
    • under exceptional conditions, 20…24 weeks (foetal abnormality gives a limit of 24 weeks)

    Latvia:

    • under normal conditions, 12 weeks
    • for medical reasons, 22 weeks