Appointed in Feb 2020. Might want to check who was actually in government at that point

Probably so people don’t take the piss with the legal fees if they’re confident of winning. See the Colette Rooney vs Rebecca Vardey case for example.

1756 hrs = 73 days, 1361 hrs = 57 days of pure sewage in the water. Wonder how much they stole from their customers to pay their shareholders.

deleted by creator

Half the sentence of people who planned an environmental protest

If it makes you feel any better she doesn’t get that pension https://fullfact.org/online/liz-truss-annual-allowance/

Only if you got 10 points for the ear

What’s the film?

I work for a university and there is no surprise. This has been building for a while.

The issue, not just for universities but the UK as a whole, is that foreign students subsidise UK research. When the government funds research projects it only funds 80% of the cost of the project (Look at UKRI funding terms). Higher foreign student fees are 3-4x UK nationals fees.

From another perspective we’re essentially selling off our intellectual property to non-nationals which really puts a dampener on our future competitiveness.

If the government is unwilling to pony up the cash to cover research, whilst actively discourage foreign students, then the quality and quantity of research is going to fall off a cliff.

Unless you spell moustache with an O

Does retirement mean anything? Can they come back and stand in the election after this one?

“Dogs are responsible for around 30,000 human deaths per year, with the vast majority of these deaths resulting from rabies that is transmitted from the dog.”

Sorry to bother you?

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt5688932/

We have “Visit Rwanda” advertised at premier league matches so guessing it’s pretty safe. Not saying the plan isn’t abhorrent or anything

It retcons the nuking of shady sands by 14-15 years, so undermines the entire fallout universe they are faithful to. What a boring hill to die on

Hello, Lionel Richie?

Sunderland?

The quote you pulled detracts from your argument. It boils down to smarter people make smarter choices.

From your source, the section- ‘Validity as a measure of intelligence’ provides useful criticism of the iq test but concludes with:

Despite these objections, clinical psychologists generally regard IQ scores as having sufficient statistical validity for many clinical purposes.

Guess he won’t be eating his own tomato puree then