Das wird eine Schelte. Für die Bundesländer.

Denn die haben maßgeblich Einfluss auf die Höhe des Rundfunkbeitrags durch die von ihnen besetzte Kommission, die die vom ÖRR eingereichte Finanzplanung prüft und daraus den Rundfunkbeitrag ermittelt, dem die Länder zustimmen müssen. Durch sie ernannte Repräsentanten haben ja diesen Wert erarbeitet.

I’ve sold used printers in the past without much trouble. But yeah, it’s not like the MK4S is bad or anything like that. This is more a case of first world problems.

Pepe was and always has been a neutral meme figure. And I’m not going to let some fking nazis take my meme frog!

Yeah, probably.

Bürgergeld kürzen?

Just read that as well, but that’s $500 on top plus $300 I “wasted” on the enclosure for the MK4S.

Aaaaaaaahrg! Guess who recently bought an MK4S and thought “Wish it was a CoreXY, though”?

Edit:

transform your MK4S fully into the CORE One without a single compromise. We are aiming for a release date in March 2025 with the projected price of 449 USD (VAT excl.) / 489 EUR (VAT incl.).

Well, at least there is that…

Weil das Feature noch auf der Warteliste ist.

Thanks for your input, but it is not a question about who benefits or what a person aught to do, but a simple logical conclusion:

For simplicities’ sake, let’s say there are 10 people voting in an election with 2 parties. Each party has 4 unwavering loyalists and the remaining 2 people’s votes depend on current events/issues. The two parties mainly take turns in government due to these swing voters.

Now enter a third party. Party 3 addresses issues that are somewhat relevant to voters of party 2 and mostly uninteresting to voters of party 1. In the next election, some voters will most likely drift from party 2 to party 3:

• Party 1: 5 Votes
• Party 2: 3 Votes
• Party 3: 2 Votes

Splitting votes between too somewhat similar parties guarantees a win for the opposite party on the spectrum. Coalitions are not possible under first past the post, so party 2 and 3 teaming up to dethrone party 1 is not an option. This continues until either another party on the opposite end of the spectrum joins the race and diminishes the votes for party 1 or one of party 2 or 3 absorbs the other.

Therefore, it is in the voter’s best interest to vote strategically against what they don’t want and not for what they do want.

Vetoes need to be abolished. But since the veto powers will veto any such motion, the UN is going to stay a toothless tiger.

How to apply a simple pressure dressing is part of the basic medical training course, which is mandatory to get a driving licence in Germany.

Anything that such a dressing can’t stop does require professional help and will kill you, crisis or not.

The issue in the US is that it IS against your political interests to vote for anyone but the least bad option.

The first past the post system simply doesn’t allow for a diverse political landscape.

Dampfterrasse

Den muss ich mir merken!

'murica, fuck yeah!

Let me guess: Field research to (in)validate his belief is out of the question?

Wer arbeitslos ist, hat kein Geld für Süßigkeiten. Wer keine Süßigkeiten isst, dessen Zähne gehen nicht kaputt.

Ich sollte arbeitslos werden!

*schwere Atemgeräusche*

Mir tut jeder Leid, der grade aus einem langen Koma aufwacht

WZF?!

Möchte man meinen, aber einer Partei beizutreten, die explizit nach einer Person benannt ist und sich dann zu wundern, wenn diese alle Fäden in der Hand halten will, hat wenig mit links/rechts, sondern mit Blauäugigkeit zu tun.

I’m not really deep into WordPress, but that Mullenweg guy seems to have a couple conflicts of interest.