Fair to middlin’

“On the right side of the dirt.”

You can win it, the reward is a slightly different cutscene but the ultimate outcome doesn’t change. It does give a little more insight into Genichiro though.

I dunno man, I think I’d ask to keep it instead of covering it. What a cool story to tell, while also helping someone who wants to help others.

Quick genuine question, what features are “roped off”? I know it’s not fast travel, cause that’s extremely cheap (like 200 gold max) and can take you to places you haven’t been yet. Is it the character editor? I belive that can be bought with RC in game though, which is a currency that’s earned in game as well. Which features are sequestered in DLC?

Removed by mod

“Oh no, that’s so sad.” - Biden

"Finish the job. " - Trump

Pretty sure Palestine is cooked.

One is an ally, and the other isn’t. It should be clear how to resolve it.

I had heard PC was having some issues with that, but to be honest, that’s nearly every release these days. But I can understand why it might be frustrating.

It’s not for no reason. It’s because they have stuff we want. Whether that’s resources, land, strategic locations, etc., that’s the reason. Furthermore, we have the means to acquire those things we want. On the great stage, that’s often justification enough.

He came and left, this is the hell let behind.

Not only isn’t it locked behind DLC, it’s incredibly cheap, and unlike a lot of titles will take you to places you haven’t even been yet. I’m talking about the ox carts, of course. Not only that, ferrystones are available for only 10k (money is relatively easy to come by). What exactly does the store have in it that is required, or even kinda necessary for convenience?

It sucks that micro transactions exist at all, but I’ve been playing the game and haven’t even opened the store at all, and the game seems pretty good. Is there any actual negativity on the actual game play, or is all the negativity sorry about the micro transactions? Because if that’s the only drawback, then that’s not really that bad.

I’m not trying to be dense here, but is there a better way to conquer and take land? If taking the land is the strategic objective, how else should they proceed other than to clear it off its current populace?

u sound mad

Spreading Managed Democracy, whether they want it or not!

What’s MAS?

Don’t forget scammers!

No idea why you’re being down voted, you’re 100% correct.

Because that’s the goal, their strategy is working as intended. The Dems don’t want something different from the Reps, they just want to be able to feign being opposed so that they can claim the moral high ground. It looks like a token effort because it is.