Yeah, I tend to support social Darwinism. Like we should have never had the tobacco suits. They just destroyed the economy of conservative areas. Hell, those who are dumb enough to smoke should, IMHO, get what they get. Why reward people for choosing to use a dangerous product? As for mitigating factors, yeah, big tobacco was targeting kids in the past. Even some old tobacco ads relied on pseudo-science. Like saying smoking during pregnancy can produce a healthier baby. The “logic” was something like, “Stress is bad for pregnancy, smoking relieves stress, so smoke for a healthier baby.”
And I have no mercy on someone being a wh-re and an attempted murderess. Really, fetuses should be a protected class with hate crimes enhancements. Yeah, that is a liberal approach, but it would be fun to beat the Libs at their own game.
As for my take on abortion, I am mostly pro-life. It would be convenient to society if more minority, poor, unfit, or disruptive people were to abort. However, I do believe abortion should be an option in cases of rape/incest or specific medical problems such as carrying a grossly deformed fetus.
I’ve heard of some weird robberies, like the robbers stumbling over their words. “Listen up mother-stickers, this is a fuck up!” Indeed, they spoke the truth.
Yeah, there really is a superbug version of AIDS. So the idea of HIV+ singles isn’t all that great. They should use protection too.
And yeah, there are AIDS deniers. They claim that HIV is rather harmless and lacks the genes responsible for the AIDS symptoms. They blame HIV drugs for producing AIDS symptoms.
Sounds a lot like the old AIDS talks. Some thought that if you have HIV and a partner with HIV, neither of you would be harmed since you are already infected. But what actually happened was that multiple HIV strains mutated together, creating “Super AIDS.”
Well, you still have to wear a mask on your penis.