I haven’t made any such claim. I’m not defending a claim I didn’t make.
this still isn’t evidence. it is just handwaving.
you haven’t presented any evidence for any claims. saying it doesn’t make it true.
the problem is strategic voting in a fptp system. if voters would vote their values (assuming their values are anti-genocide), then it wouldn’t matter.
1, voting is not harm reduction, and 2, that video has given you a false conclusion. the lesson we should learn is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, and the only way to keep third parties is to continue to vote for them.
To not answer questions put to you after you pretend to be a master debater.
not answering questions, especially loaded or irrelevant ones, is a great debate strategy.
edit:
while i think they are picking a semantic fight about a topic on which they are not prepare to engage, your engagement has been kind of shitty toward them, too. i think you could be better and still show that they are silly and ignorant of the topic.
IT IS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR A THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE TO WIN ENOUGH ELECTORAL VOTES TO BECOME PRESIDENT.
saying it doesn’t make it true
I think the issue is that a lot of people don’t believe Democrats are on the left, and Democrats don’t seem to care
she was unequivocal
discussing direct action online is literally illegal. why are you trying to bait me into committing a crime?
if they wouldn’t vote for Democrats, then it doesn’t matter how many people vote for a so called third party
All evidence from previous elections indicates this.
that’s not true
no one is saying trump is better
your video reaches the wrong conclusion. values voting is the only way to stop party consolidation. the problem is strategic voting.
making a woman perform like that is one of the most misogynist things I think anybody’s ever proposed me.
harm reduction has a specific meaning. voting is not harm reduction
I got Biden-Harris last time, and I voted for Howie. does it only work when I vote for women?
we can all see that you are not accurately characterizing this thread. it’s public.