Tax by weight, because heavier cars mean more wear on the roads.

I like Breunion a lot, for what it’s worth.

I’m not a liberal at all. I’m just not with y’all simping for authocrats.

Yes every source has bias, but only some sources have so much bias, that the comment of someone pointing it out has to get removed by the moderator.

and socialistchina.org is a completely reliable, unbiased source, right?

Sinead O’Connor before her…

Fairly niche? Most of the lemmygrad people are outright idolizing every totalitarian ‘marxist’ regime of the past century.

I totally get left ideology and do agree with Marx’ ideology, but I’ve never understood how simping for autocrats fits into that.

When I read that Lemmy had an active communist group I was looking forward to that, but the vehemence of the debate and the apologetic whitewashing of history really turned me off.

So yeah, please a debate that isn’t so black and white is very welcome imho.

Inglorious Bastards ain’t your average war flick or history lesson, it’s Tarantino doing his offbeat thing

I can understand that, I like his style ususally. But that’s point of my disappointment. As a historian I cannot see it apart from the historical events. But the crowd reaction is what really freaked me out, it’s scary if you think of it.

But remember, Tarantino’s all about pushing buttons and sparking chatter. If it got under your skin, maybe it hit the mark.

It may have. I think the true brilliance of the movie is how the audience, due to framing, can be induced to condone the killing of innocents. I sincerely hope that wasn’t actually Tarantino’s intention.

For instance the soldier killed by the bear jew refused to give up military secrets under threat of death. He chooses te respectfully refuse and is then killed. Framed differently in lots of war movies this is a heroic act.

But here people then cheer when te bear jew comes out and finishes him off.

All of this is an actual war crime.

That’s just folks enjoying seeing the Nazis get some comeuppance.

Indeed and I know, it’s all a bit of good fun. I just can separate it from the very real and very deadly seriousness of this part of history. That was what the main question of this thread was about.

Thnx!

If you only play artillery it’s certainly slow paced :p

may have been eaten with fruits such as pomegranates or dates, or dressed with spices and a type of pesto sauce

What are impossible sliders?

This kind of historiography is incredibly speculative. There is a reason those kinds of questions have their own copy paste answer on askhistorians.

You can speculate endlessly about what would’ve happened if the USA and GB would have done nothing at all. Like the source states, the second battle of El-Alamein was incredibly significant and denied Germany the middle eastern oilfields for its parched panzers. Maybe with no American activity Japan might have an appetite for some Manchuria.

We can go on forever.

Btw the source you linked doesn’t speak of the program you suggest in your title. You could de-editorialize the title.

I had another experience. The power of the first John wick movie was the very simple story of a man loosing his dog and his car, to an orgasmic vengeance bullet bukkake.

Four is the other way around. The story is so complicated and, too be honest, weak, that all the fantastic fight choreography in the world can’t offset it. It gets boring as you’re not even remotely emotionally engaged.

I will treat the wick saga like I did with the matrix. There is only one, shame they didn’t shoot a sequel.

Thanks!

Thanks!

Of the countries in discussion, I’ve only ever been to Cuba. Well it seems like a posterchild for succesful socialism and even a non-dynastic ruler. There are two currencies, one that you can use in basic shops and one for tourists (KUK). The thing is that everyone is trying their damdest to get their hands on the KUK’s as you can only use that to buy luxury products. It’s not even weird if you see what you can buy in the governement stores. It doesnt keep capitalism out, it fetishises it.

I did call European countries slightly more socialist, from an American pov, which is undeniable. There were and are ‘socialist’ regimes where they had trouble keeping their own people from leaving their country, just for w whiff of the sweet soma of capitalism. The priority, I think, is to first build a state where people are longing to live. And considering global migration the majority of economic refugees seeks capitalis countries. The power of money seems the driving problem, because it gets people what they want. You have to find a system that works better than money, that is the hard nut to crack, because it works harder the more of it you own.

Russia is actively helping break US domination over the world

Aha, that’s the angle I missed, that makes sense in a way, thanks. I really woudn’t underestimate the ability of unfettered captitalism and cronyism to break US domination on it’s own. China seems to step up to the plate quite forcefully, not through arms, but through, quite literally, owning the means of production. I do only fear their power of surveillance, and I do not condone it, too orwellian for me.

–

Wth seriously?

Leisure Suit Larry

Ken sent me

It takes leather balls to play rugby

Lubbers

That last sentence made me crack up

Joe cartoon!