Was könnte man es für größere Komplimente geben als dieses!

French is inefficient in the sense that you write a lot more letters than you speak, but to my knowledge it’s at least consistent - unlike this JavaScript of spoken languages.

Honestly, I’ve never witnessed anybody really getting those two concepts mixed up, but countless times heard ramblings about people who supposedly do.

At least not a iota less than any crack witch doctor selling above product 🤡

Time to submit purposefully bad code, and loads of it!

Money can exist outside a ledger. Bitcoin can’t, it literally is the ledger, and therefore not money.

Don’t know what I expected ^^

Die Unterscheidung von Straf- und Zivilrecht kommt mir doch recht spitzfindig vor, besonders, wo es um einen Rechtsraum in einer anderen Sprache geht.

Was die Konstruiertheit des Misogynievorwurfs angeht, so kann ich die schwer erkennen. Beweise für Lügen mögen im Urteil gewürdigt worden sein, das ist mir nach Lektüre des Artikels allerdings nicht geläufig. Die Hintergründe zur Berichterstattung rund um den Prozess zeichnen hingegen mMn ein recht eindeutiges Bild.

Interessant finde ich den Vorwurf, Frau El Ouassil habe nicht den ganzen Prozess gesehen - das finde ich im Artikel gar nicht wieder (kann es aber auch übersehen haben)? Stattdessen geht es explizit darum, dass verkürzende Memes im Umlauf sind, die Äußerungen aus dem Kontext reißen, um sie lächerlich zu machen.

Warum denn „leider“? Eine Genossenschaft scheint mir attraktiver als ein fürchterlich kompliziertes Privatunternehmen, und einfacher zu realisieren. 🙂

Ein Grund könnte sein, dass der Aufwand pro Dach vergleichsweise groß sein dürfte im Verhältnis zum Ertrag. Da lohnt es sich vermutlich aus unternehmerischer Sicht mehr, gleich etwas größer zu denken und direkt PV-Parks auf Freiflächen in der Provinz zu bauen: Weniger externe Abhängigkeiten und damit Unsicherheiten, und billiger vermutlich auch noch. 🤷

Depending on what you want to do and how much server side the server side code really needs to be, I’d suggest you take a look at:

• Django: Full blown Python web application framework with database migrations and a lot more of bells and whistles
• elm pages: Static page generator around the elm programming language, where you can bake a lot of things into a (after compilation) static html page but still have a very powerful and flexible language for dynamic content at your fingertips

Code injection is an issue everywhere as soon as you leave the realm of purely static html. That’s why I’d recommend to use a framework to do this instead of sanitizing every possible input yourself.

DRY, SoC etc. are all sane principles, but that’s not to say that you can’t have an html template and some dynamic language in the same file. You’d only have to think differently about encapsulation and code reuse. Components are a popular pattern these days, exposing functionality that you want to have in multiple places across your page.

That, on itself, is a conspiracy theory.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/03/16/did-the-cia-invent-the-term-conspiracy-theory/

While it is true that certain dietary deficits take years to surface in actual somatic issues and probably as well that the majority of vegans is younger than the western average, neither is evidence that a vegan diet (especially a modern one) can’t be sustainable & healthy for a whole lifetime.

Large fractions of the world’s population don’t eat diary products at all (like said before, lactose tolerance is rather the exception than the rule, globally), and others don’t have access to meat/fish, at least regularly, can’t keep certain animals or what not - do you consider all that unhealthy?

I’m well aware of the difference between vegetarian and vegan diets, thank you. 😉 I only wonder what you’d call a “so called” vegetarian diet, like I said.

Other than that, I think that you’re a) falling for the appeal to nature fallacy, assessing things as good because they appear in nature (despite that, for instance, without artificial care your teeth will be likely rotten away by the age of 30), and b) taking stuff as natural only because it has been there for a long time: yet unless you’re eating raw eggs and meat, nothing about such a diet is natural in the true sense of the word. Consuming another species’ milk is even quite unique in the animal kingdom and by no means natural - it’s an artificial, a cultural thing.

And culture can change. Not only are dairy products a rather European theme, I don’t see why it should be better to get proteins from highly processed and seasoned burger patties and sausages etc. (which, let’s be honest for a minute, are the dominant forms of meat consumption) than from e.g. pulses, or what makes iron from red meat healthier than iron from algea. If the presentation in the form of pills doesn’t appeal to you, I’m sure there is B12 powder as well.

There are millions of living healthy vegans proving my point, as well as vegan athletes, performing no worse than their omnivore competition. In the light of all this evidence, I’m convinced that the health argument has mostly become a distraction from moral questions: Is it OK to consume feeling and at least somewhat sentient beings for culinary or traditional reasons while at the same time having a disastrous impact on the ecosystem?

Sorry, but false dichotomy/strawman here: I never said you should only eat vegetables, nor would any vegan I can think of. What I say is that maybe you don’t have to eat meat/eggs/diary products to have enough iron, B12 and what not. Do people substitute those when living vegan? Most surely they do, yes. Does that make an unhealthy diet? I don’t think so, no.

Also, what would distinguish a “so called” vegetarian diet from a real one?

Being omnivore means you’re not specialized in one source of food, but that you can feed from basically anything. It does not mean that you need to take in everything you can digest on a regular basis.

Humans can run, climb and swim. We’re not great at any of these ways of movement, but not many animals match our versatility. I can’t outrun a wolf, but I can get out of its reach on a tree. I can’t swim away from a crocodile, but it will have a hard time catching me on dry land. On the other hand, a lot of predators wouldn’t follow me into the water.

We’re generalists. Being able to do a lot of things usually means that you don’t excel at specifics. I wouldn’t argue that regularly swimming, climbing and running is unhealthy, on the contrary. But the inverse argument, that you can’t have a healthy way of life without all of those, is obviously incorrect.

I thought of something similar, but that again doesn’t save me from having to plug in the disks one by one. Don’t know what I expected though, because you can’t make a hard drive suddenly beep or turn a light on. ^^

Ok, but if I have to backup, say, 5 TByte worth of data, I’d have to plug in several disks and reinstantiate my pool. ^^

What I am rather looking for is a script or something that would split the backup files into folders of, let’s say, 3 TByte which I can rsync to different drives. But as it looks, I’ll have to write that myself. That’s not an impossible task, but I wonder how good that works with duplicity/borg.

Thank you nonetheless!