Excerpts:

“Seattle responded to the request by filing a lawsuit in Travis County, stating they cannot comply because Texas has no jurisdiction in Washington State, and no care was provided by the hospital in Texas. They also point out that the Dormant Commerce Clause, protected by the United States Constitution, “protects the right to interstate travel, including to obtain healthcare services.” By targeting out-of-state hospitals for enforcement of laws that only apply within the jurisdiction of Texas, they “discriminate against healthcare based on an interstate element,” violating constitutional protections, according to the legal filing. Lastly, Seattle Children’s Hospital cannot comply due to a shield law passed by Washington State. This law bars the hospital from providing any patient data and from responding to subpoenas pursuant to “protected healthcare services” obtained within the jurisdiction of Washington. Protected healthcare services include abortion, reproductive care, and gender-affirming care.”

“This case promises to be extraordinarily complex. Seattle Children’s Hospital is challenging the jurisdiction of the demands directly in a Texas state court. Regardless of what the local court decides, the claims are likely to go to the Texas Supreme Court. Given that the claims also have a time limit on them and that appeals in Texas automatically favor the attorney general due to an automatic lifting of stays in the state, Seattle Children’s Hospital workers and providers for trans patients from Texas could be under legal jeopardy. Ultimately, the case presents questions of conflicting state laws and regulation of conduct across state lines, and the implications of those laws could be dire for abortion and trans care nationwide.”

  • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    11 months ago

    This case promises to be extraordinarily complex

    Does it? It seems pretty clear to me that the state of Texas does not have any authority over a children’s hospital over 1000 miles outside of its jurisdiction. What exactly is complex about this?

    • BreakDecks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s going to be complex because the Texas AG has already made their dumb decision, and now the hospital is suing the state of Texas in Texas.

      It’ll be complex because the fascist Texas courts are involved.

      • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        I would be surprised if this could lose, even in Texas. The court will have to confront the double standard of Texas laws applying to other states, but other states laws not applying in Texas. Setting the precedent that states must comply with medical laws from other states would be a major win for Texans, which is why they can’t let it happen.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The court will have to confront the double standard of Texas laws applying to other states, but other states laws not applying in Texas.

          I’m sure they’ll find a way to conclude Texas State Is Best State

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        This might be a first pass where they intend to make the case go away under Texas jurisdiction if they can first and if they can’t, then they might just say “well you don’t have jurisdiction here anyways” and take it to federal court.