• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    There is already very heavy pressure on Turkey to let Sweden in, so I don’t see this having any chance to fizzle out, Turkey may be a valuable member, but there are limits to their value.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Black Sea or Baltic Sea.

        Get both and you’ve cut off 2/3 of Russia’s major ports. (facing west)

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I think getting out of Mediterranean at Gibraltar is worth more than getting into the black sea. If Turkey wants to play hardball with EU USA and NATO, they will quickly realize how much they are the underdog, and no idiot dictator shouting his stupidities can prevent that.
        Turkey is not playing by the rules, but is exploiting a situation, despite the it would benefit Turkey too to have Sweden in NATO.
        If Turkey can’t respect the mutual interests of an international institution they themselves benefit from, they can go fuck themselves.
        Some things can be bought at too high a price.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s very different. Turkey completely controls access to the Black Sea, which ties into several MAJOR river networks across Europe. The strait of Gibraltar is much wider, and also not controlled by a single nation, so it’s far less feasible to block, for a lot of reasons.

    • nekandro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There is no limit to the geographic value of Turkey against Russia