• Crozekiel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This thing is so recent it could play MP3s… The first Discman was released in 1984. I’m actually really confused why they picked such a recent version, the technology was almost phased out when this thing was released. FFS the original iPod came out a year before this thing…

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is this your kid nephew’s “museum”?

    “Old” is not 20 years and that is not a goddamn discman. Sorry, Ralphie. You can do better.

    • jpeps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think you’re missing the point. Museums collect this stuff not because it’s old, but because it was significant to people at the time and they want to collect it for prosperity. Imagine if they waited until 2050 and then said “Shit! Wasn’t there a cd player we all liked at some point? Does anyone have one?” They should have one, they’re a museum! Many museums will be maintaining an iPhone collection for example.

      Regardless, most people under 30 likely do not have access to a cd player, and I’d guess many never owned one. It’s not strange for that to be in a museum even without what I’ve said above.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I disagree with you. In the tech industry, 20 years is ancient. If you were born in 1985, 20 years prior that was 1965, and the tech of that decade was very different from the 80s tech.

      Imagine someone living in a year where calculator watches were already a thing, and when in a museum displaying one of those radios in wooden cabinets and knobs with the style of the time they said “that’s not old!!!”

    • danielbln@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sorry to be the one breaking the bad news, but you might be old yourself if you think like that. Don’t sweat it, happens to all of us.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Man that one can play mp3 discs. That has to be newer than 2002. Burning CDs wasn’t super common yet.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      11 months ago

      I had a aftermarket head unit that played mp3 cds in 2002.

      I had a mp3 player in 1999.

      We were definitely burning cds back then, this woulda come at a premium but the tech was there.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        I remember downloading mp3s from usenet in 1999 on my Windows 95 computer. I’d start the download, go to work, then retrieve the file when I got home.

        I felt so fancy buying a CD burner at Best Buy so I could burn them onto CDs. It was the first PC component I ever installed by myself.

        • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          We share pretty similar experiences with this. Only that in 1999 both our ISDN lines were in use during the day. That robbed me of the possibility of continuously downloading files, getting home and start enjoying the downloads.

          I remember being bummed by this back in the day.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        My brother had an mp3 player in 1999. I think it had 16MB of storage space. I didn’t see the point of it when you could only put like 5 songs on the thing.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 months ago

          I could fit roughly 1 hour of music on mine, longer if I dropped the bitrate to 96kbps instead of 128.

          The biggest benefit of the mp3 player was that the anti-skip protection didn’t drain the battery twice as fast, no moving parts so it never skipped. This seemed super cool to me because I skateboarded and stuff and generally liked the idea of no skips.

          • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            The biggest benefit of the mp3 player was that the anti-skip protection didn’t drain the battery twice as fast

            I strongly disagree. In those days, mp3 players that fit single CDs that were slightly larger than a modern day thumb drive. And you could get 128mb ones for slightly more money. But that was much smaller and more portable than something that had to fit an entire CD.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        BMWs in 2002 used Alpine head units. I knew their aftermarket units could play MP3 CDs so I thought “why not test it out?” Turns out it could play it just fine. It mapped the folder buttons to the seek/scan buttons if you held it and played them just fine. I was floored it did that but wasn’t anywhere in the manual.

    • damium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I had that very device right about 2002. Put my whole CD collection on a few mp3 disks. Replaced it a few years later with a 6GB mp3 player.

      • caesar_salad83@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Me too! I think it was around 2007 that i got an iRiver H10. My only other standalone music player I ever bought with my own money.

        • damium@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s awesome, I had an iRiver as well. Ended up putting custom firmware on it after a bit as the original firmware was buggy at times and lacked features. The device itself was surprisingly capable and could even play video.

    • RadButNotAChad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sure it was, in America at least. I think I got my first PC that could burn disks in like 1998 and it was a mass marketed Compaq from Circuit City. Napster showed up the next year and CD burning exploded. Napster was dead by 2001.

    • xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      My car around 03 had a shit cassette deck that ate tapes. The mp3 discman with a cassette adapter was a game changer.

      I had the entire Atari Teenage Riot and Mindless self Influence discography on one disk.

      I’m sure the bit rate was abysmal, but with that kind of music it is kind of a feature.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I had this exact model in 2002. It was a revelation and possibly one of the best portable CD players ever released. You could sit there and tap it all day and it wouldn’t skip.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I remember getting a MP3 player in 2000 that had 16Mb of space. If I compressed the shit out of the songs, I could fit almost a whole album on there!

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      The Colorado Railroad Museum has railroad crossing signals donated by BNSF that are only a few years old. Museums will gladly accept both old and new.

      • skyspydude1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yup. I’m pretty sure the Computer Museum out in Mountain View has stuff on display that’s less than 5 years old in some of their “progress of technology” type displays. I think when I last went there a couple years ago, for gaming history they had all the latest (at the time) consoles as well. It was pretty funny seeing something like a PS4 in a history museum though.

    • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      If I bought one today, I’d spend the extra $10 for a rechargeable unit. The one bad memory I have of these was having to replace the batteries so frequently.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can use rechargeable batteries in it… Built in rechargeable batteries suck. The entire lifespan of the device is tied to that battery. Give me something that runs on AAs any day.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It doesn’t have to be that way? Just because they’re built-in doesn’t mean they can’t be easily replaced. Cars’ headlights are built-in. They’re not soldered to the chasis.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It doesn’t have to be but it is. Other than some laptops I don’t think I’ve ever been able to get a replacement battery for something after it stopped holding a charge. Things aren’t made to be repairable anymore.

        • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Does anyone make batteries that aren’t shitty NiCd or NiMh? Basically Lion rechargeables?

          I’ve never seen it where I am

    • Jo Miran
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Whoa…they have a USB-C rechargeable one.

      You know, if they sold an audiophile one, with clean electronics, a good built in amp, and the ability to play FLAC files (microSD port), I’d buy one.

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Kinda off-topic, but I honestly miss the in-line remotes high-end Discman & portable Minidisc players used to have…

    Really wish they would make a come-back in some way, maybe as a supplemental Bluetooth device?

  • Bread@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean it was over twenty one years ago. Technology ages fast. You can also say it had historical significance so it can end up in a museum earlier than you might expect.

  • krakenx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    That was legit the best MP3 CD player. It never skips no matter how much you shake it and it builds a different, but consistent shuffle playlist depending on what song was playing when you hit shuffle.