• Servais
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Interesting take. I found it bad even without this analysis, but it’s interesting to have an other perspective.

    • _ed@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah the headline is pure clickbait. The movie can just suck because… it wasn’t good.

  • newline@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow… This review is huge pile of horse shit 😂

    I honestly can’t take any review seriously that has to do such aggressive mental gymnastics to blame the audience for a movie doing bad. Completely missing the point as well IMO that many of the issues of that movie were that it was a lazy, poorly done retrace of the previous movies.

    • _ed@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Having seen it now I agree. This reels like a precursor to a new form of ChatGPT clickbait/rage content.

    • _ed@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now I’m going to have to checkout dezion I’m assuming the two are cut together. Probably still pretty ponderous.

      Animatrix was fantastic no doubt.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was horribly written, just like the other sequels. The Wachowskis aren’t good filmmakers, and are even worse at content development. What a stupid article.