• Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    Have you tested this? Or are you just guessing what things would feel like, and assuming you’re right without trying it?

    • Irelephant@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      im six months late, (forgot about lemmy) but i did test it, i looked at something i never touched that would probably be fine to lick, and licked it. Probably doesn’t work all the time.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh thank God. I can finally sleep again! That scientific quandary was keeping me up at night.

        I appreciate your dedication to science!

    • XTornado
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean… It’s not that far fetched… You can see the texture with the eyes so you can have a good estimation of how that will feel licking it.

  • TeaHands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    This might be the showerthought that’s given me the most to think about ever. Can’t stop thinking about licking my couch, for a start. Well played OP.

  • foyrkopp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The ability to extrapolate what something would taste/feel like from mere looks is a learned one.

    Toddlers don’t have it yet, which is why they’re stuffing everything into their mouths.

    You might not consciously remember licking a carpet, but the part of you that’s holding up the “dusty”, “textured” and “CRUMBS!!” signs does.

  • Rukt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    You might be surprised. Investigation into Molyneux’s Problem found that people born blind, who later had their sight restored, could not identify by sight the objects they already knew by touch.