We estimate that by 2025, Signal will require approximately $50 million dollars a year to operate—and this is very lean compared to other popular messaging apps that don’t respect your privacy.

  • squeakycat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Indeed. Xmpp is lost as a general purpose chat app for everyone. I have many issues with matrix but it’s the best chance we have, particularly with bridges.

    • kpw@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      XMPP is the IETF Internet Standard while Matrix is just another custom IM protocol managed by a venture capital funded startup which keeps losing money.

      • squeakycat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t disagree with that statement; however, that doesn’t make it something the general public will embrace. Its mess of extensions are top little too late. That ship has long sailed. And I say this as someone that prefers using XMPP for 1:1 chats

    • u_tamtam@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Edit: Sorry, I responded to the wrong parent.

      I don’t believe Matrix is better positioned than XMPP to succeed. On a technical aspect, Matrix hasn’t managed to stabilize its protocol, and they’ve been a decade into it. This has resulted in only a single organization being in charge of the protocol, the client and the server implementations. This isn’t sound, this isn’t sustainable. And now, unsurprisingly, this organization is in a financial crisis, has lost important customers, has no budget secured to maintain its staff in the next years, and recently underwent a major licensing change that we can only interpret as a shift towards an opencore model at the detriment of the regular user.

      • slacktoid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The license change is to a GPL variant from the Apache license. How does that affect the regular user? Wouldn’t it be better?

        • u_tamtam@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t pretend to know the future, but if you read between the lines and the justifications provided, this isn’t really about AGPL per se, but about Element brokering AGPL exceptions. Practically we can expect all kinds of forks with opencore options that might enshittify the user experience in different ways, and further solidification of Element’s single-handed control over Matrix (which had been a prime concern for many years). Matrix is by the day closer to the closed-source centralized silos it was first pretending to oppose.

          • slacktoid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hear what youre saying, I don’t like the license exceptions. I just hope it doesnt go that route.