“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We hope that shooting ourselves in the foot today will allow us to run faster in the years to come

    Expecting either US political party to drop its support for Israel is a fool’s game.

    • ButtermilkBiscuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Seriously these fucking morons are going to assist the guy who wants a “complete and total ban on Muslim entering our country…” because they don’t like Biden’s support for Israel? I understand this is a no win situation but given the choice who’s going to be better for Muslims domestically or abroad? Clearly the dem. And on that point I wonder if they think trump would have behaved any differently toward Israel? Spoiler alert.

      They have a point though, neither d nor r is going to be “good” for Muslims or Palestinians, our track record sorta proves that out.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seriously these fucking morons are going to assist the guy who wants a “complete and total ban on Muslim entering our country…” because they don’t like Biden’s support for Israel?

        Maybe they figure that when Trump was supporting his Muslim ban, they had one major party on their side.

        Instead of zero parties on their side and one party gloating that they have no choice.

        • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          Never mind a party which is more than happy to call them morons for feeling let down and wanting a candidate who actually stands up for them.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            39
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wanting someone to stand up for you isn’t moronic.

            What’s moronic is voting in such a way that elects the party FURTHEST from your ideal.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              1 year ago

              If the party needs their votes, it should act like it needs their votes.

              They certainly know how to act like they need Republican votes.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I see this kind of thinking often, with regards to young voters, black voters, blue collar workers, immigrants, women, etc.

        ‘We’ve checked with the experts and determined that they should be grateful! Why won’t they adjust their lived experience to match our policy platform!!’

        It doesn’t matter whether you agree with them. They’re leveraging power. You are free to disregard them if you think your personal narratives are enough to keep you comfort after Trump wins.

        If Biden and his supporters want to win, they need to stop arguing with their voters and start listening. It’s not that complicated.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ll be comfortable if Trump wins. I’m a cis white male who makes over $200k per year. Hell, I’ll probably get a fucking tax cut.

          These idiots are going to be among the first and worst to get hurt.

          I’ll vote to try to stop them from hurting themselves but there’s only so much I can do.

        • Uranium3006@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Democrats feel entitled to votes from their base are are offended at the idea they might have to earn their vote. They blackmail us with Republicans and victim blame when their bad electoral strategy fails them

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            This isn’t unique to Democrats, it’s a feature of the left in general. Democrats aren’t bending over backwards to get progressive votes, but progressives aren’t bending over backwards to get moderate votes either. If a Democrat loses, moderates blame Progressives for not showing up. If a progressive loses, progressives blame moderates and the establishment.

            I mean how many progressives criticize Bernie’s electoral strategy instead of blaming the DNC? Bernie completely wrote off Florida and Cuban Americans instead of trying to win them over. He aimed for 40% of the vote in the primaries. And he relied on non voters to win.

            Democrats and progressives BOTH prefer to bicker with each other and make no efforts to court each other’s base. They’d rather blame each other than critique their electoral strategy. And when fascists rise to power because of this bickering, both will blame each other again.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Bernie completely wrote off Florida and Cuban Americans instead of trying to win them over.

              And just like that, candidates are expected to win votes.

        • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          This implies their voters are speaking in a unified voice. They’re not. Subsets are, closer to it, but overall, politics is about compromise and consensus.

          If you want the power of dominion, go for a monarchy, and if you don’t want to compromise at all, go to war. When it comes time for peace again, it’ll be some manner of compromise.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            This implies their voters are speaking in a unified voice. They’re not. Subsets are, closer to it, but overall, politics is about compromise and consensus.

            “We decided you’re expendable. We still expect your solidarity.”

      • stolid_agnostic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tried asking that question on a post somewhere around here and they pretty much responded like I was the biggest moron who had to be spoken down to.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ban + more ethnic cleansing > no ban + less ethnic cleansing

          It’s utterly disingenuous to suggest the two are mutually exclusive. The ethnic cleaning only intensifies under Trump, and the ban is in addition to that. Unless we’re in a bizarre world where Trump suddenly loves brown people and Palestinians.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Gee I wonder why you guys have practically no meaningful political presence in reality. Maybe if you tell me more about how much I love genocide, I’ll see the purity in your idealistic views and decide to support your cause instead.

              Of course, I could fire back that you want dead Palestinian babies since you refuse to go against the most deadly option – but that would be as utterly disingenuous as writing off all Biden supporters as genocide supporters.

              • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                Biden allowing their death is the most deadly option. Do you people even hear yourself? I couldn’t give a fuck if you support us or not, which is preferred since liberals tend to co-opt movements and try to redirect the energy to neoliberalism.

                • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Personally I think a Republican actively killing them would be the most deadly option. I’m curious though why you think Biden would result in more Palestinian deaths than any Republican candidate.

    • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then again not like the “very shoot ourselves in the foot, but just little bit, instead of lot” on decades long repeat leads to anything good.

      If ones vote is to be taken for granted, you have no power. Only way you can hold your own side accountable is by threatening to withhold the vote.

      That is bargaining. Voting Democrat nomatter what and after that asking could they please do something, that is begging. Begging rarely works as well as bargaining.

      Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Joys of two party system.

      Most likely people just get apathy and instead of flipping to Trump, they simply stay home. Which is the other bargain. What you offer for me to bother to go from my home to the voting station in the first place.

      That is their play “you can’t take us for granted anymore, we care about our vote and bargaining power on long term enough to suffer on short term to buy long term relevance”.

      Whether it works is different matter. I don’t know, if democratic leadership has the where with all to take their left flank of voters as anything but given serval supporters to be kept in line with “but we are only little bit bad, those guys are really really bad”.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t wait till we find out in a few months how Russian & Iranian money was actually fueling this.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    The guy running against Biden has far worse policies with regard to Muslims. If that guy wins it “proves” America wants the worse policies, potentially causing Democrats to switch to those policies to try to win.

    Luckily, this is a publicity stunt that I don’t foresee changing any actual votes.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Biden’s stance on Israel is driving away voters, that’s just normal. This is one of those important polarizing issues, and he can’t avoid accountability, for good or bad. The death count and coverage has guaranteed that.

      As for “America wants” language, that doesn’t mean anything. Different people have different goals.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who are Zionists actually voting for? If it’s not the Democratic party, then why would he continue to be pro-Israel? Whom is he pandering to with that stance?

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are many reasons politicians might be pro war. The military industrial complex is too powerful, among other things.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        for “America wants” language, that doesn’t mean anything. Different people have different goals.

        Sure, it’s shorthand, but the idea is that the Democratic Party might nominate a presidential candidate who has harsher views about Muslims and Palestine, if they see those views being the reason they lost, or among the reasons they lost.

        They would see that they had the “better” policies and still didn’t get the votes from the people who care most passionately about them, so their approach did not work. Maybe they go closer to the protesters view to try to get their votes, or maybe they give up on the protesters as a voting bloc since they couldn’t even get their vote when they had the “better” policies. That would entail going further away from the protesters views.

        Either could happen, I don’t know the polling, but my point is that it isn’t just “we will take 4 years of Trump to make our point and make Democrats listen,” they may be taking 4 years of Trump and then proving that no one should align their policy views with theirs going forward because it hurts more than it helps.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rationally, you have a valid point.

      But I can totally understand people who can’t bring themselves to vote for someone actively supporting a genocide. Something that Trump didn’t do during his tenure in office.

      Lesser of two evils only works when the distinction is clear to everyone.

      Biden needs to separate himself from Israeli genocidal politics, and it seems his cabinet is trying to shift.

      So in conclusion, you might consider this a publicity stunt. And maybe it is. But recent elections have shown that you can’t ignore your base, you need to fire them up to really turn them out.

      So this is definitely a good move.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But I can totally understand people who can’t bring themselves to vote for someone actively supporting a genocide. Something that Trump didn’t do during his tenure in office.

        Trump provided military assistance, approved arms sales, and personally vetoed a bill to end US military assistance to the Saudis in Yemen which is considered a genocide as well.

        And his Israel “peace plan” was literally just giving the Israelis everything they wanted so if you’re giving him credit for Israel/Palestine actions you’re literally just giving him credit for not being the president when this happened. He absolutely would have been worse for Palestinians, he just didn’t have the power at the time.

        • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then they stay home to vote “neither of the above” or in more active form cast ballot voting for “Mickley mouse” aka foiled ballot.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        But I can totally understand people who can’t bring themselves to vote for someone actively supporting a genocide. Something that Trump didn’t do during his tenure in office.

        Trump was trying to oppress them personally. Maybe sympathy for those suffering a genocide is more important to them than their own safety, but maybe it shouldn’t be.

        Also, do you really think Trump wouldn’t support Israel killing every last Palestinian they could?

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good thing there’s someone else running in the primary that’s polling 10 times higher than that guy.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ve heard of Williamson. Those charts say she’s polling in the single digits and is only ahead of some dude named Phillips that I’ve never heard of.

            Not sure where you’re getting your 10x or even 2x numbers.

            OP didn’t mean some rando that no one’s ever heard of. “The guy running against Biden” meant the only other person with any chance of being president in 2025

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think those graphs say what you think they do. Unless you haven’t noticed that blue line way at the top.

            • jonne@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Obviously the incumbent is polling at 80%+, I’m just saying that Phillips is even less likely to challenge Biden than Williamson, so there’s really no point in saying he’s even worse than Biden.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I find it funny that people trot her out as if she’s some solution here. Will you be telling gay men who loathe her for minimizing AIDS to suck it up and vote for her?

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they succeed in electing Trump, Democrats won’t need to reflect about anything because they won’t be allowed to run for office anymore.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They must want to completely lose Democracy because they aren’t getting their way. That’s what’s in the ballot. There very likely won’t BE 2028 election if Rump gets back in.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      If democracy isn’t working for them, why would they vote for it? Remember, they just voted with Republicans to censure Rashida Tlaib over nothing too, and then there’s all the other stuff like student loans, the child tax credit, gaslighting people about how well the economy is going, etc.

      Generally voting for democrats on the federal level just means halting or slowing down the inevitable ratchet towards fashism, not actually improving things, because there always a Lieberman or a Manchin ready to sink anything that would be too lefty.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        If democracy isn’t working for them, why would they vote for it?

        Because it can get worse. This seems obvious.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Of course it can and will. But just like Weimar Germany, the centrist parties (or in this case, the only non-fascist party) are too busy with their heads up their asses (or scare mongering about socialism) instead of solving people’s issues. Why would they support the party that will punish the few representatives they have any time they stand up for Muslim issues?

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              The alternative in this case being “treating people like you need their votes.”

              The party would rather have Trump than the nightmare scenario of acting like their voters are worth anything.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                Look, I can’t keep people from hurting themselves. I will call them morons leading up to and afterwards though.

                Same as I did for dipshits in red states losing maternity wards now. /shrug

            • Uranium3006@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Both options keep getting worse and continuing to paly a rigged game isn’t worth it. The Republicans might just cheat and win and all.the.Biden capitulation will have been for nothing

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                You show me the policies the Democrats have that comes even close to this- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

                I mean I don’t like the Democrats, but my god… Trump and his people want a one-party state with him as dictator for life and one of his kids succeeding him.

                The capitulation would have been for stopping that.

                • Telorand@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Don’t worry. There will be no shortage of people clutching their pearls and smugly saying they stood up for their ideals by not voting for Democrats, as they ride to concentration camps.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Generally voting for democrats on the federal level just means halting or slowing down the inevitable ratchet towards fashism

        Is it an inevitable turn towards fascism, or is it people refusing to vote against fascism because Democrats don’t “inspire” them?

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can either keep shaming non-voters, or democrats could maybe do something for them once in a while that’s not a corporate giveaway disguised as policy.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            If a progressive is running against a fascist, and a moderate chooses not to vote because they think both options are “too extreme”, does that mean the progressive candidate inevitably leads to fascism?

            I’ll happily keep shaming non voters, because their logic makes no fucking sense and I hate such blithe idiocy. I’m no Democrat spokesperson nor party official. If a random person being mean to them online is enough for them to refuse to vote against bigotry, I couldn’t care less about their opinion.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If a progressive is running against a fascist, and a moderate chooses not to vote because they think both options are “too extreme”, does that mean the progressive candidate inevitably leads to fascism?

              Last time moderates didn’t get their very first choice, they formed a PAC to fundraise for McCain/Palin.

      • WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        then there’s all the other stuff like student loans, the child tax credit

        I see someone isn’t following what is happening or how this works. The President, leader of the Dems, changed federal policy to forgive student loans (or at least a big chunk of them for a big chunk of the population) and it got struck down by the Supreme Court thanks to the other party. The Dems passed the child tax credit and then couldn’t get it through the house to renew it because of the other party.

        Generally voting for democrats on the federal level just means halting or slowing down the inevitable ratchet towards fashism, not actually improving things

        Let’s say that’s true, it’s objectively not but let’s pretend it is. Isn’t that still the obviously better option? How the fuck is fascism today better than fascism tomorrow?

    • jhulten@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then we don’t fucking deserve it or it will be time to refresh the tree of liberty. When disenfranchised people tell you that they don’t see a difference, ask why. These folk have lost family members and are telling you that, from their perspective the only difference between having a R and a D in the White House is whether you show up to protest too.

      • iBaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Refresh the Tree of Liberty”… that’s some bullshit, Trump gets into office and he’ll chop that tree down himself. Then deport all the Muslims he can. Voting R is the literal version of “chop your nose off to spite your face”.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they can’t see a difference between having legal abortions and not, they’re fucking idiots.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, Roe still exists and we need to preserve it by… making excuses for not codifying it.

        • jhulten@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you can’t see the difference between not being able to get an abortion and your mother being dead, then I pity you and your lack of empathy.

          If the overturn of Roe has turned you into a one issue voter, then I will pair you off with a 2nd amendment one issue voter and you can angrily jerk each other off.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Na I just picked an issue that any fucking moron would be able to tell the parties apart on.

            Hey maybe Trump will be better on Muslim relations though.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you look at Democrats and Republicans and see no difference, you may want to ask yourself why a Trump presidency would be the same for you as a Biden presidency. There aren’t a whole lot of non white working class Americans who can say that.

  • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s notable that the Republicans have not attempted to court the pro Palestinian voters in reaction to the anger at Biden. Because they are if anything more pro Israel / anti Palestine than the Democrats.

    I agree that the Dems are the “only slightly better” party in a few aspects, and they need to do better. But slightly better is still better than the alternative and we need to vote like it.

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use a taxi analogy often when it comes to issues like this. You’re on 8th Street and want to get to 1st Street. There are two taxis in front of you a Blue Taxi and a Red Taxi. The Blue Taxi will take you to 4th Street. The Red Taxi will take you to 21st Street before beating you up and leaving you for dead in the gutter.

      Which taxi do you take?

      Note: “Neither” isn’t an option because if you don’t choose, then some random people choose for you and shove you in the taxi.

      Yes, neither taxi takes you to your destination, but the Blue taxi is a lot easier to recover from and reach your destination than the Red taxi.

      Would it be better if you had a taxi that took you to your exact destination? Definitely, but this is where realism meets idealism. In the real world, you rarely have perfect options. You often need to decide which option is closest to perfect for you. In this case, the Democrats/Blue taxi are flawed but are worlds better than the Republicans/Red taxi.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This exceedingly simple logic seems beyond a good portion of the US population.

      • PineRune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Blue taxi runs out of gas halfway there because the red taxi siphoned it out for their own use.

      • Dinsmore@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yet in a state where you WILL be shoved in a blue or red taxi no matter what (say, CA for blue), you could vote for a green taxi stand to be put there so at least next time there are more options - or at least the blue taxi will deliver you to 3rd street.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The problem is that the blue taxi only promises to take you to 4th. When you get in, it just sits there. When you ask the driver why he’s not moving, he insists that he is and tells you that you must be from the other cab company. If you try to get out and walk, he screams at you. As long as you’re in the cab and not perfectly silent about wanting to get any closer to your destination, the driver screams at you. Eventually the driver gets mad if you’re not smiling.

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dunno if people know Biden’s past as a darling of the Israel lobby. Obama used to attend pro-Palestinian events and knows very well what’s going on, part of why he picked Biden was because he was disliked by the Israel lobby, and that was his way of courting them. Of course at the helm he had to go back on his views. That’s kind of the point here too, what’s in the best interest of US foreign policy is largely determined by the military industrial complex, voters don’t have a say in this really. Neither does the President in a lot of respects either, because furthering the country’s foreign policy is more about what America is to the world than what the parties are to Americans.

      Given Biden’s poor polling in basically every swing state against Trump the party should really be picking a better candidate if they want a guaranteed victory in the election. I’d be doing the same as these Muslim groups if I was in the US because I’d want the Democrats to win, I don’t see a way forward for this right now without the party stepping up with some major changes. What I see instead are Democrat voters shaming potential Democrat voters in to voting instead of demanding the party do better, and yes it’s true if those people voted we wouldn’t get Trump again, but saying as much is more about validating your position than actually doing the work to get that victory. I feel like at this point Democrat voters are just going to shame people for caring about genocide and there’s no way that’s going to get them votes, probably more the opposite.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I see instead are Democrat voters shaming potential Democrat voters in to voting instead of demanding the party do better

        I mean the reality here is just that you and I want different things. I don’t want the Democrat party to “do better” in any some ways you want, and you don’t want them to “do better” in some ways I want. That’s just what being in a coalition is, and Dems are a very broad coalition

        • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          To be clear by “do better” I mean appeal to most voters, which means transferring politics that have broad support in to policies. Right now they provide policy and basically invent the politics to underlie it.

          Also let’s be clear what’s being asked of Muslim voters right now, “support the fascist genocide against your people vicariously by supporting the Democrats, because the alternative will be worse.” That’s a BIG ask, that’s why it’s never addressed directly and diverted with “this is the best you can get.” To then shame those voters and blame them for worsening the situation… you’re telling them this system requires them to die one way or another. I don’t blame them one bit for taking this position.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t want the Democrat party to “do better” in any some ways you want, and you don’t want them to “do better” in some ways I want.

          When was the last time the party did better in ways you didn’t want?

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    FTA:

    “a reflection of their outrage over President Biden’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war.”

    If that’s legit their position, then they have no candidate in 2024. It’s not like they can vote for Trump.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And they clearly stated that they know trump would be worse short term, but they are hoping this puts long term pressure on democrats to represent their issues more.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will never ever understand minorities that vote this way. I get people who are like me voting conservative, I don’t but I get their self-interest pov. You are literally voting for people who want you deported. They have made that crystal clear.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah that worked real well for the people that didn’t vote for Hillary because sanders that shafted by the DNC. DNC never learned their lesson and Trump winning again I doubt they will learn.

    • floppade [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I worked for that campaign during that election cycle. You would think that the DNC and coordinated campaigns would learn that not listening to voters hurts you. Shaming them didn’t work last time either. They didn’t fund outreach. They didn’t listen to organizers on the ground. They didn’t care.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You would think that the DNC and coordinated campaigns would learn that not listening to voters hurts you.

        They would rather lose than listen to voters.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      DNC never learned their lesson

      At this point I honestly think the lesson they’ve learned is that curb-stomping the progressives and daring them to stay at home gets us all 4 years of punishment under the GOP and in the next election they get 100% of what they wanted in the first place without any actual lefties having power.

      When you remember FDR, this is exactly what they did then- FDR, scion of privilege, ran on a progressive platform for an electorate thirsty for lefty policy. He surrounded himself with other left-leaning bluebloods interested in progressive politics but dead set against actual leftists gaining power. They doled out progressive policies as political favors but strictly kept the rabble out of actual power.

      Likewise, in the waning years of the Prussian Empire, Otto von Bismarck (a staunch monarchist, facing an uprising of social democracy politics he despised) famously undertook socialist-y policies like socialized medicine and old-age insurance/pensions to steal political support from the social democrats while keeping them strictly out of power.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I could be wrong but I don’t see that happening until the GOP shatters. I see Dems traditionally as a coalition of basically not GOP voters. Just using single voter issues for this example, Let’s say we had a viable pro choice and pro gun third party, how many people from the current 2 parties would that pull from. I would wager mostly from the dem side which means larger chance of GOP winning. Which is a risk DEMs won’t take and I feel the DNC know this.

  • TwoGems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah sorry these people are idiots and should be ignored. We are in a really dangerous position right now where we could still fall to fascism and need every blue vote we can.

    Do they honestly think that a Republican or Trump (who banned people from Muslim countries) aren’t gonna ban them too?