The answer to this question will decide whether I will continue with my current org. We have a couple hundred volunteers reporting to a lead that is paid an undisclosed amount from an undisclosed source

  • stigsbandit34z [they/them]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Thanks, I think this really helps me out. Dealing with a sorta dark money deal that smells like the DNC and while I think they’re trying to do something good, this leader shuts down any ideas that conflict with the org’s agenda. Anyone pointing out root causes is not taken seriously, I might add. Most of this is local organizing (which is why I felt like I might be able to make a difference), but it’s starting to feel like we can’t question anything :/

    I am starting to feel like a Christian spreading my religion, the only difference is that I can very well provide evidence for my claims

    • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like a sketchy situation. In orgs where there’s only like one paid staffer imo it should not be leadership getting paid, instead it should be staff doing the tiring work that nobody wants to do. This avoids the obvious conflict of interest in someone using their position of power in the org to get themselves paid.

      If you’re not already, I’d recommend out-organizing this “leader”, which is to say, build your own side group to oppose this. Start with one-on-one conversations with the people who seem on board with you already.

      • stigsbandit34z [they/them]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really appreciate the help. Oh I can tell you I already have some people on my side, so maybe something can be done :) Things get muddied though because it claims to be “neither democrat nor republican” so the opinions vary quite a bit