In a shocking, horrifying incident at Shawnee Mission East High School, a Black student was hospitalized after being attacked by a white male student. Despite being the victim, she faces suspension in a case highlighting systemic racism and administrative negligence.

  • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    But by doing this are they not opening themselves to even worse lawsuits? A student was called a racial slur and hospitalized and they’re handing her the same punishment as the aggressor.

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to the article, racism is a systemic problem in this school. One of the school officials, yelled at some black kids because they were walking down the hall together and thus “were looking intimidating.”

      When the administration is racist, they’re willing to overlook students being racist.

    • Copernican@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I always hate the blurred lines of administrative disciplinary action or criminal investigation. What is the schools role if a criminal investigation is underway.

      Also, I think the article is missing some key facts, like durations of suspensions. I think some could argue that both the boy and girl deserve some suspension, but it by no means should be equal suspension given the racial charged aggression. Is there a difference between a closed fist punch versus a shove? Who through the first punch?

      Did the article even mention the date this occurred? It just says last week, which was a holiday week. So come Tuesday not sure how long the suspensions have even been served and what the administration is deciding for next steps.

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        She defended herself after he attacked her you goob.

        There is no defensible argument for suspending her. She very clearly defended herself.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “If someone starts to assault you just say ‘no thank you.’
          It’s against the rules for them to continue.”

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually you can see she’s the one who went for the face first. He was just provoking and pushing.

          Bullies rarely start physically attacking people, they just provoke until the victim snaps so they have the green light and can say they’re not the ones who started it. That’s why it’s so hard to frame stuff like this, victims are in a situation of emotional stress and more prone to be impulsive, while bullies know what they’re doing and how to be able to “play the victim” afterwards.