My 11 year old spends 50% of his time with an anti-science and anti-vaccine family. Single parent me (in Ohio) doesn’t have a lot of support when I’ve tried to help fight some of those thoughts he’s been brainwashed with in the name of religion. I’m christian, but his other household is extremists. “You believe in science too much” and “cavemen never existed” are things he’s said in the last year. He’s a straight A very smart child, he’s just been brainwashed and I want to try to help him before it gets worse.

What kinds of shows, books, documentaries can I expose him too to make him think more critically about some of these things so he understands science is real and vaccines work?

He does get into Veritasium on YouTube, so I feel like that’s a step in the right direction for science and critical thinking.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Cheers

  • tygerprints@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    You put it exactly right - she’s been brainwashed by religious nonsense and bigotry her whole life, like so many people of the world. There’s no bigger form of child endangerment than being anti-vax, and this person should be reported to child protective services. She is a real danger to your kid.

    I would not let my child anywhere near such a mentally ill person. She won’t believe she’s mentally ill, and probably will never get the help she sorely needs - but you can protect your own kid and show him that there are good people who trust science and want their kids to be healthy and well vaccinated.

    I hope you will go out of your way to avoid this other family. Just the very childishly stupid belief that “cavemen never existed” would be enough to drive me away from this incredibly screwed up person and never want to have any affiliation with them ever again.

    • InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      From the wording of the post and depending on where they’re located, this is a child that is a part of a legal custody arrangement. Removing the step-parent from the child’s life is not a simple thing that is within the power of OP unless the other parent can be convinced which seems unlikely.

      They would need to go through the legal system and demonstrate that the child is in a clear and present danger in order to amend their current custody agreement. Ideological differences are not going to be enough for a court to agree to any changes except in the most extreme of cases. At least in the US.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know, at least in my country, anti-vax indoctrination does count as clear and present danger, and while you probably wouldn’t outright get full custody, you could potentially get an injunction against anti-vax indoctrination.

        Sadly I doubt this is true of the US.

        • InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Quickly looking over their history I’d be willing to bet they are US based and although I’d be happy if that were possible it most certainly is not. An injunction of that nature to censure “religious” speech, even on the slim chance it would be granted, is basically unenforcable here. They would get a slap on the wrist a few times and then maybe with enough evidence a less favorable custody percentage, but by that time a lot of the damage will have already have been done to the child. They’re at a pretty impressionable age.

          • enkers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, here, your rights to religiously indoctrinate your children are protected by our charter of rights. Anti-vax beliefs, on the other hand, certainly wouldn’t fall under that purview.