• Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ahh, yes, well I suppose if you’re mostly reading comics that were made in the '70s and you really want to capture that faded 32-colors-Ben-Day-dot-printed-on-newsprint feel, that’ll be just perfect.

      • jcarax@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s limited for sure, but there are most definitely color e-ink displays now.

        But the bigger limitation is still refresh rate, and lifespan of the display in devices that try to force more frequent refreshes.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair point. Will correct my above post. But either way: unless you find screens particularly eye-straining or have extreme battery-life desires, I don’t really see e-ink tech as worth the downsides at this point, at least for non-text content. For a watch where I want an always-on screen and endless battery and I’ll never watch video on it? Yes, I want more e-ink and low-power LED tech and the like. But for tablets? I’m good with the vibrant colors of a glowing LED screen.

          • jcarax@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Watches sound great on e-ink, but last I looked into it, the displays couldn’t support the frequency of refreshes over a reasonable life time.

            I’m with you, by the way. I do like having a compact e-ink reader, but I really don’t want to do anything but that with it.

            • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Huh, that’s disappointing. It’s funny how everybody keeps experimenting but nobody seems to have topped the Pebble for watch form-factor: low-power gameboy-ish LED screen and more of an old-school micro-controller chip instead of a phone-like chip and just use the “shake to wake” functionality to brighten the backlight.

              Pebble might not have been the smartest smartwatch, but it was definitely the watchyest smartwatch. Always-on screen and week-long battery.

              • jcarax@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I feel like Garmin is building their spiritual successor. They don’t try to do too much, but they do quite a lot. And there are so many models, they address most folks use cases in one way or another.

                Btw, the dude from Pebble (also Beeper, Eric Migicovsky) is trying to build a small Android phone.