• DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    targeting civilians

    Citation? My understanding is that IDF claims they are targeting valid military targets and the civilian casualties are collateral damage. If you want to blame anyone for the hospitals being destroyed, blame Hamas for using them as bases.

    • ProcurementCat@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      f you want to blame anyone for the hospitals being destroyed, blame Hamas for using them as bases.

      When the police shoots hostages, I blame the police just as much as the terrorist. That’s why I blame Netanjahu and Likud just as much as Hamas.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re inappropriately conflating targeting hostages with collateral damage from targeting the terrorist. They’re not the same thing. Israel does the latter.

        The opinion that one should let the terrorist keep shooting your people from behind their hostages because any reprisal is unacceptable is a very foolish take that encourages future hostage taking.

        • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But the issue is that Israel is absolutely capable of executing this war while causing massively fewer civilian casualties, and their failure to do is intentional and deplorable.

          And that’s not even taking account of the fact that Netanyahu’s government have encouraged the development of hamas for their own political means. This war didn’t happen in a vacuum, and Israeli colonialism is a significant factor in causing this crisis.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israel is absolutely capable of executing this war while causing massively fewer civilian casualties

            The alternatives I see to sending in troops with air support are, 1) Send troops in without air support into hostile urban guerilla territory, resulting in heavy casualties, or 2) Do not retaliate for Oct 7, encouraging further future attacks. What alternative do you have in mind that would cause fewer civilian casualties?

            Netanyahu’s government have encouraged the development of hamas for their own political means

            Yup, divide and conquer seems to have been a terrible strategy in hindsight, it appears he will be voted out soon because of this.

            Israeli colonialism is a significant factor in causing this crisis.

            Indeed.